Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30130634›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2018

Specific differences in temporal binding aspects of the attentional blink in Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Justin Kopec, Natalie Russo, Kevin M Antshel, Wanda Fremont, Wendy R Kates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin KopecDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address: jbkopec@syr.edu.
Natalie RussoDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Kevin M AntshelDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Wanda FremontDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Wendy R KatesDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Funding

Biomarkers for Psychosis in Velocardiofacial SyndromeR01MH064824 · NIMH · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI KATES, WENDY · 2002 to 2015
$7.3M
The neurophysiology of sensory processing and multisensory integration in ASDR01MH101536 · NIMH · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI RUSSO, NATALIE · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064824NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11DS) is a genetic syndrome characterized by a variety of cognitive impairments, including difficulty with attention. 22q11DS is the strongest known genetic risk factor for developing schizophrenia, a disorder characterized by impairments in visual attention and temporal binding processes. Here we examine a specific temporal visual attention phenomenon (the attentional blink; AB) within two rapid serial visual presentation tasks, and compare those with 22q11DS to groups of typically developing individuals matched on chronological (CA) and mental age (MA). Performance of individuals with 22q11DS was sensitive to differing task demands. On a Category Task, individuals with 22q11DS performed similarly to control groups on all measures of the AB, with the exception of lower detection accuracy of the first of two targets. In contrast, on a feature-based Color Task which required temporal binding of stimulus features, individuals with 22q11DS differed from CA and MA matched control groups on all AB performance measures, exhibiting lower target accuracy, more temporal binding errors, and a deeper, more protracted AB. Temporal binding in the visual domain is thought to be dependent on a serial attention mechanism that facilitates simultaneous firing of neurons in multiple areas of the visual cortex, activating short-term working memory for storage of bound features. Given the discrepancy between these two tasks, results suggest that temporal binding processes may be significantly affected in individuals with 22q11DS, a finding that importantly, has been previously demonstrated among individuals with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttentionAttentional BlinkDiGeorge SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAttentional blinkChromosome 22q11.2 Deletion SyndromeTemporal attentionVisual processing

Identifiers

PMID30130634
PMCPMC7730721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.