Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30130529›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cell2018

Coming to Consensus: A Unifying Model Emerges for Convergent Extension.

Robert J Huebner, John B Wallingford

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The role of Rho GTPases in facial morphogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The dynamics of tubulogenesis in development and disease.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert J HuebnerDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
John B WallingfordDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: wallingford@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

Control of collective cell movement by planar cell polarity signalingR01GM104853 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI WALLINGFORD, JOHN B · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell motility is a widespread biological property that is best understood in the context of individual cell migration. Indeed, studies of migration in culture have provided tremendous insight into the signals and mechanics involved and have laid the foundation for our understanding of similar migrations by larger cellular collectives. By contrast, our understanding of another flavor of movement, cell intercalation during convergent extension, is only now emerging. Here, we integrate divergent findings related to intercalation in different settings into a unifying model, paying attention to how this model does and does not resemble current models for directed cell migration.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBody PatterningCell Culture TechniquesCell MovementConsensusHumansMorphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID30130529
PMCPMC6140352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.