ArticleMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2019
WISDOM survey: attitudes and behaviors of physicians toward vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) treatment in women including those with breast cancer history.
Article in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05585476 (Effectiveness of C02 Microfractionated Laser in Conjunction With Topical Regenerative Therapy in the Management of Vulvo-vaginal Atrophy in Patients With a History of Breast Cancer. Randomized Experimental and Comparative Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of C02 Microfractionated Laser in Conjunction With Topical Regenerative Therapy in the Management of Vulvo-vaginal Atrophy in Patients With a History of Breast Cancer. Randomized Experimental and Comparative Study.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of randomised clinical trials - The safety of vaginal hormones and selective estrogen receptor modulators for the treatment of genitourinary menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors.Post reproductive health · 2023Pooled it
- Case-Based Perspectives on the Management of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Treating Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Postmenopausal Women with a History of Breast Cancer.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Gap in Sexual Dysfunction Management Between Male and Female Patients Seen in Primary Care: An Observational Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Observational
- Vaginal health in breast cancer survivors: a practical clinical approach.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Investigation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer Survivors: Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Estriol, Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone and Ospemifene.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer Survivors: Current Perspectives on the Role of Laser Therapy.International journal of women's health · 2023Review
- Genitourinary symptoms in women with breast cancer: what do oncology health professionals think and do about them?Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Sexual Dysfunction in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer on Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Modern management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
- Experience with ospemifene in patients with vulvar and vaginal atrophy and a history of breast cancer: case studies.Drugs in context · 2020Article
- Practical Treatment Considerations in the Management of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause.Drugs & aging · 2019Review
- The MATE survey: men's perceptions and attitudes towards menopause and their role in partners' menopausal transition.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Addressing Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA)/Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) for Healthy Aging in Women.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate and compare physicians' behaviors and attitudes regarding vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) treatment in menopausal women, including women with breast cancer, using an internet-based survey.
methodsThe WISDOM survey queried obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) and primary care physicians (PCPs) with 23 multipart questions assessing behaviors and attitudes towards VVA treatment.
resultsOf 2,424 surveys sent, 945 (39%) responded and 644 (27%) were completed. Of the menopausal women seen by OB/GYNs and PCPs, 44% to 55% reported having VVA symptoms. Physicians prescribed VVA treatments primarily because of effectiveness. Only 34% of OB/GYNs and 17% of PCPs felt comfortable prescribing VVA therapies to women with a personal history of breast cancer. In general, the most common VVA treatment recommended by all was prescription therapy (49%; with or without other therapies) in the form of US Food and Drug Administration-approved vaginal estrogen creams. More OB/GYNs (72%) than PCPs (47%) disagreed that VVA was best treated with over the counter than prescription products. Out-of-pocket cost and fear of risks associated with estrogens were believed to be the main barriers for why women choose not to get treated and why they discontinue treatment.
conclusionsMore OB/GYNs than PCPs prescribed VVA treatment, especially vaginal estrogens, for menopausal women, but both groups generally had similar attitudes and behaviors regarding VVA treatment. Physician comfort was low when prescribing to women with a history of breast cancer, despite women's health medical societies supporting vaginal estrogen use in women with a history of estrogen-dependent breast cancer who were unresponsive to nonhormonal therapies when offered in consultation with their oncologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.