Observational studyMedical care2018
Organizational Influences on Time Pressure Stressors and Potential Patient Consequences in Primary Care.
Observational study in Medical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient-reported experiences and patient-reported experience measures in primary care, home care, and community settings. A scoping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Rebuilding the foundation: recommendations from the Summit to Revitalize Primary Care (Rev PC).BMC proceedings · 2026Article
- Time to care: the lived experience of receiving care from a primary care service for people with frequent hospital admissions.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Humanizing care in the ICU: how system pressures shape interacting patterns of hurry, blur, burden, and cruelty.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Language Concordance and Interpreter Use for Spanish-Preferring Patients: Qualitative Study of Perspectives from Primary Care Providers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- "Good Care Is Slow Enough to Be Able to Pay Attention": Primary Care Time Scarcity and Patient Safety.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Content analysis of patient support groups related to myositis on Facebook.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Turning Down the Flame on Medical Gaslighting.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- My Goals Are Not Their Goals: Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of Patient-Centered Care for Patients with Multimorbidity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Physician Diagnosis and Knowledge of Mild Cognitive Impairment.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Provider and coach perspectives on implementing shadow coaching to improve provider-patient interactions.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2021Article
- Effects of care bundles for patients with pressure ulcers and the impact on self-care efficacy.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Job Demand, Job Control, and Impaired Mental Health in the Experience of Workplace Bullying Behavior: A Two-Wave Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care teams face daily time pressures both during patient encounters and outside of appointments.
objectivesWe theorize 2 types of time pressure, and test hypotheses about organizational determinants and patient consequences of time pressure. RESEARCH
designCross-sectional, observational analysis of data from concurrent surveys of care team members and their patients. SUBJECTS: Patients (n=1291 respondents, 73.5% response rate) with diabetes and/or coronary artery disease established with practice teams (n=353 respondents, 84% response rate) at 16 primary care sites, randomly selected from 2 Accountable Care Organizations. MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: We measured team member perceptions of 2 potentially distinct time pressure constructs: (1) encounter-level, from 7 questions about likelihood that time pressure results in missing patient management opportunities; and (2) practice-level, using practice atmosphere rating from calm to chaotic. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-11) instrument measured patient-reported experience. Multivariate logistic regression models examined organizational predictors of each time pressure type, and hierarchical models examined time pressure predictors of patient-reported experiences.
resultsEncounter-level and practice-level time pressure measures were not correlated, nor predicted by the same organizational variables, supporting the hypothesis of two distinct time pressure constructs. More encounter-level time pressure was most strongly associated with less health information technology capability (odds ratio, 0.33; P<0.01). Greater practice-level time pressure (chaos) was associated with lower PACIC-11 scores (odds ratio, 0.74; P<0.01).
conclusionsDifferent organizational factors are associated with each forms of time pressure. Potential consequences for patients are missed opportunities in patient care and inadequate chronic care support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.