Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30130164›Full record

SynthesisSports health

Risk Factors Associated With Low Back Pain in Golfers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jo Armour Smith, Andrew Hawkins, Marybeth Grant-Beuttler, Richard Beuttler, Szu-Ping Lee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Golf and Physical Health: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Return to Golf after corrective surgery in adult spinal deformity patients with long fusion constructs: A retrospective case series.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Golf Athletes: A Championship in Portugal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. The efficacy of injury screening for lower back pain in elite golfers.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2023
    Article
  14. Sport and non-specific low back pain in athletes: a scoping review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Low back pain and golf: A review of biomechanical risk factors.Sports medicine and health science · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jo Armour SmithDepartment of Physical Therapy, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Irvine, California.
Andrew HawkinsLos Angeles Angels, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Marybeth Grant-BeuttlerDepartment of Physical Therapy, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Irvine, California.
Richard BeuttlerIndependent Researcher, Santa Ana, California.
Szu-Ping LeeDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

context: Low back pain is common in golfers. The risk factors for golf-related low back pain are unclear but may include individual demographic, anthropometric, and practice factors as well as movement characteristics of the golf swing.

objective: The aims of this systematic review were to summarize and synthesize evidence for factors associated with low back pain in recreational and professional golfers. DATA SOURCES:: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus electronic databases through September 2017. STUDY SELECTION:: Studies were included if they quantified demographic, anthropometric, biomechanical, or practice variables in individuals with and without golf-related low back pain. STUDY

design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level 3. DATA EXTRACTION:: Studies were independently reviewed for inclusion by 2 authors, and the following data were extracted: characterization of low back pain, participant demographics, anthropometrics, biomechanics, strength/flexibility, and practice characteristics. The methodological quality of studies was appraised by 3 authors using a previously published checklist. Where possible, individual and pooled effect sizes of select variables of interest were calculated for differences between golfers with and without pain.

results: The search retrieved 73 articles, 19 of which met the inclusion criteria (12 case-control studies, 5 cross-sectional studies, and 2 prospective longitudinal studies). Methodological quality scores ranged from 12.5% to 100.0%. Pooled analyses demonstrated a significant association between increased age and body mass and golf-related low back pain in cross-sectional/case-control studies. Prospective data indicated that previous history of back pain predicts future episodes of pain.

conclusion: Individual demographic and anthropometric characteristics may be associated with low back pain, but this does not support a relationship between swing characteristics and the development of golf-related pain. Additional high-quality prospective studies are needed to clarify risk factors for back pain in golfers.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnthropometryAthletesBiomechanical PhenomenaBody Mass IndexGolfHumansLow Back PainRisk Factorsbiomechanicsgolflow back painrisk factorsswing

Identifiers

PMID30130164
PMCPMC6204638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.