Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30129809›Full record

SynthesisJournal of palliative medicine2018

Using the Palliative Performance Scale to Estimate Survival for Patients at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Dawon Baik, David Russell, Lizeyka Jordan, Frances Dooley, Kathryn H Bowles, Ruth M Masterson Creber

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04869085 (The Use of a Digital Application for Reporting Pain and Pain Management in Home Hospice), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04869085 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Use of a Digital Application for Reporting Pain and Pain Management in Home Hospice

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled88ConditionsPainArmse-PainSupport
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Opioid use in patients aged 90 years or older with terminal cancer in a palliative care unit: a single-center retrospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The use of artificial nutrition at the end-of-life: a cross-sectional survey exploring the beliefs and decision-making among physicians and nurses.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dawon Baik1 School of Nursing, Columbia University , New York, New York.
David Russell2 Appalachian State University , Boone, North Carolina, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York.
Lizeyka Jordan3 Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York.
Frances Dooley3 Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York.
Kathryn H Bowles4 School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York.
Ruth M Masterson Creber5 School of Nursing, Columbia University , New York, New York.

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Should we return patient reported outcomes to human subjects participants?-exploring ethical obligationsR00NR016275 · NINR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MASTERSON CREBER, RUTH MARIE · 2018 to 2020
$896k
mHealth for Heart Failure Symptom MonitoringK99NR016275 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MASTERSON CREBER, RUTH MARIE · 2016 to 2017
$182k
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) has been widely used for survival prediction among patients with cancer; however, few studies have reviewed PPS scores in heterogeneous palliative care populations across multiple care settings.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to determine how the PPS tool has been used to estimate survival at the end of life.

methodsThis review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the existing literature published from 2008 to 2017. We synthesized study characteristics, the PPS scores at baseline, and primary outcomes, and explored differences in survival estimates by diagnosis. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Good ReseArch for Comparative Effectiveness (GRACE) checklist.

resultsSeventeen studies were included in this review (nine with cancer and eight with mixed diagnoses). All included studies reported that the PPS exhibited a significant association with survival. Survival estimates ranged from 1 to 3 days for patients with PPS scores of 10% compared with 5 to 36 days for those with scores of 30%. The categorical cut-points for the PPS scores were not consistently reported across studies.

conclusionThis review provides a broad overview on the prognostic value of the PPS tool for survival among multiple patient populations across care settings. Consistent reporting of PPS scores would facilitate the comparison of survival estimates across end-of-life diagnoses.

Indexed as

Survival AnalysisHumansPalliative CarePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisTerminal Carehospicespalliative carePalliative Performance Scaleprognosisreviewsurvival

Identifiers

PMID30129809
PMCPMC6211821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.