Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30129715›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice

Indicators to guide health equity work in local public health agencies: a locally driven collaborative project in Ontario.

Benita Cohen, Katherine Salter, Anita Kothari, Marlene Janzen Le Ber, Suzanne Lemieux, Kathy Moran, Caroline Wai, Deborah Antonello, Jordan Robson, Rosana Salvaterra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Organizational level indicators to address health equity work in local public health agencies: A scoping review.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Benita CohenCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Katherine SalterHealth & Rehabilitation Sciences, Elborn College, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Anita KothariSchool of Health Studies, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Marlene Janzen Le BerBrescia University College, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Suzanne LemieuxSudbury & District Health Unit, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Kathy MoranDurham Region Health Department, Whitby, Ontario, Canada.
Caroline WaiToronto Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah AntonelloAlgoma Public Health, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Jordan RobsonAlgoma Public Health, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Rosana SalvaterraPeterborough Public Health, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
Western University · CAEssar Steel Algoma (Canada) · CARegional Municipality of Durham · CAToronto Public Health · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFunded by a Public Health Ontario 'Locally Driven Collaborative Project' grant, a team led by public health practitioners set out to develop and test a comprehensive set of indicators to guide health equity work in local public health agencies (LPHAs).

methodsThe project began with a scoping review, consultation with content experts, and development of a face-validated set of indicators aligned with the four public health roles to address health inequities (NCCDH, 2014), plus a fifth set of indicators related to an organizational and system development role. We report here on the field testing of the indicators for feasibility, face validity (clarity, relevance), reliability, and comparability in four Ontario LPHAs. Data were collected by two separate individuals or groups at each site, during two consecutive periods. These individuals participated in separate focus groups at the end of each test period, which further examined indicator clarity, data source availability and relevance. A third focus group explored anticipated indicator uses.

resultsField testing showed that indicators addressed important issues in all public health roles. Although the capacity for indicator use varied, all test sites found the indicators useful. Suggestions for improved clarity were used to refine the final set of indicators, and to develop a Health Equity Indicator User Guide with background information and recommended resources.

conclusionThe process of evaluating health equity-related activity within LPHAs is still in its early stages. This project provides Ontario LPHAs with a tool to guide health equity work that may be adaptable to other Canadian jurisdictions.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesData CollectionFocus GroupsHealth EquityHumansInformation DisseminationOntarioOrganizational ObjectivesProgram EvaluationPublic HealthReproducibility of Resultshealth equityindicatorsOntariopublic health practice

Identifiers

PMID30129715
PMCPMC6126562
OpenAlexW2887289043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.