Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30129691›Full record

Trial reportDepression and anxiety2019

The accuracy of passive phone sensors in predicting daily mood.

Abhishek Pratap, David C Atkins, Brenna N Renn, Michael J Tanana, Sean D Mooney, Joaquin A Anguera, Patricia A Areán

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Depression and anxiety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Location Data for Depression Prediction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Abhishek PratapDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-6932
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-5781-9880
Brenna N RennDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-8746-171X
Michael J TananaSocial Research Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-4347-6757
Sean D MooneyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-0833
Joaquin A AngueraDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7216-0674
Patricia A AreánDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-5971-6319
University of Washington · USSage Bionetworks · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

CLINICAL SERVICES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH018261 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Kaja Zabrina LeWinn, Rachel L. Loewy · 1985 to 2026
$7.0M
Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
Can Metal Health Apps Work in the Real World? A Feasibility Pilot StudyR34MH100466 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANGUERA, JOAQUIN A, GAZZALEY, ADAM H · 2013 to 2015
$818k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH100466NIMH NIH HHS R34MH100466NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018261NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073553NIMH NIH HHS T32MH073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphones provide a low-cost and efficient means to collect population level data. Several small studies have shown promise in predicting mood variability from smartphone-based sensor and usage data, but have not been generalized to nationally recruited samples. This study used passive smartphone data, demographic characteristics, and baseline depressive symptoms to predict prospective daily mood.

methodDaily phone usage data were collected passively from 271 Android phone users participating in a fully remote randomized controlled trial of depression treatment (BRIGHTEN). Participants completed daily Patient Health Questionnaire-2. A machine learning approach was used to predict daily mood for the entire sample and individual participants.

resultsSample-wide estimates showed a marginally significant association between physical mobility and self-reported daily mood (B = -0.04, P < 0.05), but the predictive models performed poorly for the sample as a whole (median R

conclusionsPassive smartphone data with current features may not be suited for predicting daily mood at a population level because of the high degree of intra- and interindividual variation in phone usage patterns and daily mood ratings. Personalized models show encouraging early signs for predicting an individual's mood state changes, with GPS-derived mobility being the top most important feature in the present sample.

Indexed as

AffectAdultDepressionFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSmartphoneambulatoryclassificationdepressiongeographic positioning systemsmobile health (mHealth)monitoringpassive data collectionsmartphones

Identifiers

PMID30129691
PMCPMC8491547
OpenAlexW2888288032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.