Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30129367›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018

Instrumental Effects in the Dynamics of an Ultrafast Folding Protein under Mechanical Force.

David De Sancho, Jörg Schönfelder, Robert B Best, Raul Perez-Jimenez, Victor Muñoz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Modulation of a protein-folding landscape revealed by AFM-based force spectroscopy notwithstanding instrumental limitations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ultrafast folding kinetics of WW domains reveal how the amino acid sequence determines the speed limit to protein folding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David De SanchoKimika Fakultatea , Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU) and Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC) , P.K. 1072, 20080 Donostia , Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8985-2685
Jörg SchönfelderCIC nanoGUNE , 20018 San Sebastián , Spain.
Robert B BestLaboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases , National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland 20892-0520 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7893-3543
Raul Perez-JimenezCIC nanoGUNE , 20018 San Sebastián , Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7094-6799
Victor MuñozIMDEA Nanosciences , Faraday 9, Ciudad Universitaria Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid , Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5683-1482
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESIkerbasque · ESIMDEA Nanoscience · ESNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

Understanding protein folding, evolution and function via molecular simulationZIADK075104 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI BEST, ROBERT · 2013 to 2025
$13.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DK999999NULL Z99 DK999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis and interpretation of single molecule force spectroscopy (smFS) experiments is often complicated by hidden effects from the measuring device. Here we investigate these effects in our recent smFS experiments on the ultrafast folding protein gpW, which has been previously shown to fold without crossing a free energy barrier in the absence of force (i.e., downhill folding). Using atomic force microscopy (AFM) smFS experiments, we found that a very small force of ∼5 pN brings gpW near its unfolding midpoint and results in two-state (un)folding patterns that indicate the emergence of a force-induced free energy barrier. The change in the folding regime is concomitant with a 30,000-fold slowdown of the folding and unfolding times, from a few microseconds that it takes gpW to (un)fold at the midpoint temperature to seconds in the AFM. These results are puzzling because the barrier induced by force in the folding free energy landscape of gpW is far too small to account for such a difference in time scales. Here we use recently developed theoretical methods to resolve the origin of the strikingly slow dynamics of gpW under mechanical force. We find that, while the AFM experiments correctly capture the equilibrium distance distribution, the measured dynamics are entirely controlled by the response of the cantilever and polyprotein linker, which is much slower than the protein conformational dynamics. This interpretation is likely applicable to the folding of other small biomolecules in smFS experiments, and becomes particularly important in the case of systems with fast folding dynamics and small free energy barriers, and for instruments with slow response times.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingMechanical PhenomenaMicroscopy, Atomic ForceProtein ConformationProteinsTemperatureProteins

Identifiers

PMID30129367
PMCPMC6384157
OpenAlexW2888572662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.