Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30129174›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2018

The appearance of mimetic Heliconius butterflies to predators and conspecifics.

Denise Dalbosco Dell'Aglio, Jolyon Troscianko, W Owen McMillan, Martin Stevens, Chris D Jiggins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Seeing Through the Mimicry ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Implications From the Analogous Relationship Between Evolutionary and Learning Processes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pervasive mimicry in flight behavior among aposematic butterflies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Quantifying visual acuity inBiology letters · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neural divergence and hybrid disruption between ecologically isolatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denise Dalbosco Dell'AglioButterfly Genetics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2854-7054
Jolyon TrosciankoCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama.
Martin StevensCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.
Chris D JigginsButterfly Genetics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G022887/1Cambridge Overseas TrustCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 9423/11-7European Research Council 339873European Research Council Speciation Genetics 339873Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive coloration is under conflicting selection pressures: choosing potential mates and warning signaling against visually guided predators. Different elements of the color signal may therefore be tuned by evolution for different functions. We investigated how mimicry in four pairs of Heliconius comimics is potentially seen both from the perspective of butterflies and birds. Visual sensitivities of eight candidate avian predators were predicted through genetic analysis of their opsin genes. Using digital image color analysis, combined with bird and butterfly visual system models, we explored how predators and conspecifics may visualize mimetic patterns. Ultraviolet vision (UVS) birds are able to discriminate between the yellow and white colors of comimics better than violet vision (VS) birds. For Heliconius vision, males and females differ in their ability to discriminate comimics. Female vision and red filtering pigments have a significant effect on the perception of the yellow forewing band and the red ventral forewing pattern. A behavioral experiment showed that UV cues are used in mating behavior; removal of such cues was associated with an increased tendency to approach comimics as compared to conspecifics. We have therefore shown that visual signals can act to both reduce the cost of confusion in courtship and maintain the advantages of mimicry.

Indexed as

Biological MimicryColor PerceptionPigmentationSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsBirdsButterfliesCuesFemaleFood ChainMaleWings, AnimalAposematismavian visionbutterfly visionmating behavioropsinUV light

Identifiers

PMID30129174
PMCPMC6221148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.