Comparative evaluation of in-house Carba NP test with other phenotypic tests for rapid detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

backgroundThe prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is alarming worldwide causing serious infections. Rapid and accurate identification of CRE is crucial to reduce the mortality and morbidity. In this study, we tried to develop an in-house Carba NP test for detection of CRE and evaluate its performance with others.

methodsA prospective study was conducted with 40 nonrepeating Enterobacteriaceae isolates over a period of 3 months. All the isolates were screened for carbapenem resistance as per CLSI 2016 guidelines followed by PCR for blaNDM-1, blaOXA-48, blaKPC, blaVIM, and blaIMP genes. All the isolates were subjected to five phenotypic tests, that is, in-house Carba NP (iCarba NP), commercial Carba NP (cCarba NP), Blue-Carba, modified Hodge test (MHT), and CHROMagar.

resultsAmong the 40 isolates, 87.5% were identified as Escherichia coli, 7.5% were Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2.5% were Enterobacter cloacae, and 2.5% were Citrobacter freundii. Thirty-three of 40 (82.5%) isolates were found to harbor one or more resistant genes. Considering PCR to be the gold standard test, sensitivity of the phenotypic methods for CRE detection ranged from 63.6% (MHT) to 96.9% (CHROMagar). Both cCarba NP and iCarba NP observed to have highest specificity. The performance of iCarba NP was found comparable with cCarba NP by kappa score 1 and found approximately 10 times less expensive than cCarba NP.

conclusionCHROMagar was observed most sensitive assay for detection of CRE followed by both Carba NP tests. iCarba NP was proved cheaper and equally good as cCarba NP for detection of CRE.