Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128927›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2018

SAMPL6 host-guest blind predictions using a non equilibrium alchemical approach.

Piero Procacci, Massimiliano Guarrasi, Guido Guarnieri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Host Dynamics under General-Purpose Force Fields.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SAMPL7 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Piero ProcacciDepartment of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via Lastruccia n. 3, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy. procacci@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-3847
Massimiliano GuarrasiCINECA-Interuniversity Consortium, via Magnanelli 6/3, 40033, Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy.
Guido GuarnieriENEA, Portici Research Centre, DTE-ICT-HPC, P.le E. Fermi, 1, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we compute, by means of a non equilibrium alchemical technique, called fast switching double annihilation methods (FSDAM), the absolute standard dissociation free energies of the the octa acids host-guest systems in the SAMPL6 challenge initiative. FSDAM is based on the production of canonical configurations of the bound and unbound states via enhanced sampling and on the subsequent generation of hundreds of fast non-equilibrium ligand annihilation trajectories. The annihilation free energies of the ligand when bound to the receptor and in bulk solvent are obtained from the collection of work values using an estimate based on the Crooks theorem for driven non equilibrium processes. The FSDAM blind prediction, relying on the normality assumption for the annihilation work distributions, ranked fairly well among the submitted blind predictions that were not adjusted with a linear corrections obtained from retrospective data on similar host guest systems. Improved results for FSDAM can be obtained by post-processing the work data assuming mixtures of normal components.

Indexed as

Carboxylic AcidsComputer SimulationLigandsMolecular StructureProtein BindingProteinsSoftwareSolventsThermodynamicsCarboxylic AcidsLigandsProteinsSolventsBinding free energyCrooks theoremFinite size correctionFSDAMHost–guestNon-equilibriumOcta-acidsSAMPL6Solute tempering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.