ArticleCurrent medical science2018
Application of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting in Obese Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Current medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Research progress in minimally invasive treatment of cervical nerve root canal stenosis under total endoscope].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in obese patients. Totally, 153 obese patients who underwent EVH (n=81) or standard bridging technique (SBT, n=12) in CABG surgery from May 2012 to October 2014 in our hospital were enrolled in this retrospective non-randomized controlled study. The general situation of operation, postoperative complications and short medium-term outcomes were analyzed. The baseline characteristics were similar between these two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in total operation time (226±28 min vs. 224±30 min, P>0.05), number of damaged vessels (0.12±0.05 vs. 0.16±0.06,P>0.05) and short medium-term outcomes including revascularization rate (1.25% vs. 2.78%, i 0.05), vessel dysfunction rate (11.25% vs. 11.11%,P>0.05) and mortality (0.00% v . 0.00%, P>0.05). Use of EVH was associated with significant reduction of total harvesting time (41 ±6 min vs. 63± 11 min, P<0.05), incision length (4.4±1.1 cm 18.2±4.5 cm, P<0.05) and postoperative lower extremity complications (P<0.05). EVH can reduce the risk of wound complications, whereas does not influence short- and medium-term outcomes in obese patients. It can be considered a reliable procedure of harvesting vessel conduits for obese patients undergoing CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.