Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128848›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Computationally simulated fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography angiography based on fractional myocardial mass.

Huan Han, Yong Gyun Bae, Seung Tae Hwang, Hyung-Yoon Kim, Il Park, Sung-Mok Kim, Yeonhyeon Choe, Young-June Moon, Jin-Ho Choi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huan HanComputational Fluid Dynamics and Acoustics Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Anamdong 5Ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea.
Yong Gyun BaeComputational Fluid Dynamics and Acoustics Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Anamdong 5Ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea.
Seung Tae HwangComputational Fluid Dynamics and Acoustics Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Anamdong 5Ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Yoon KimDepartment of Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Il ParkDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Mok KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeonhyeon ChoeDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-June MoonComputational Fluid Dynamics and Acoustics Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Anamdong 5Ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea. yjmoon@korea.ac.kr.
Jin-Ho ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Republic of Korea. jhchoimd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4839-913X

Funding

Korean Society of Circulation 201301-01Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology 2014-1National Research Foundation of Korea 2017R1A2B3010918Samsung Biomedical Research Institute GL1B33211Samsung Medical Center Heart Vascular and Stroke Institute Clinical Research Project OTC1601861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based calculations of fractional flow reserve (FFR) can improve the diagnostic performance of CCTA for physiologically significant stenosis but the computational resource requirements are high. This study aimed at establishing a simple and efficient algorithm for computing simulated FFR (S-FFR). A total of 107 patients who underwent CCTA and invasive FFR measurements were enrolled in the study. S-FFR was calculated using 145 evaluable coronary arteries with off-the-shelf softwares. FFR ≤ 0.80 was a reference threshold for diagnostic performance of diameter stenosis (DS) ≥ 50%, DS ≥ 70%, or S-FFR ≤ 0.80. FFR ≤ 0.80 was identified in 78 vessels (54%). In per-vessel analysis, S-FFR showed good correlation (r = 0.83) and agreement (mean difference = 0.02 ± 0.08) with FFR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of S-FFR ≤ 0.80 for FFR ≤ 0.80 were 84%, 92%, 92%, 83%, and 88%, respectively. S-FFR ≤ 0.80 showed much higher predictive performance for FFR ≤ 0.80 compared with DS ≥ 50% or DS ≥ 70% (c-statistics = 0.92 vs. 0.58 or 0.65, p < 0.001, all). The classification agreement between FFR and S-FFR was > 80% when the average of FFR and S-FFR was < 0.76 or > 0.86. Per-patient analysis showed consistent results. In this study, a simple and computationally efficient simulated FFR (S-FFR) algorithm is designed and tested using non-proprietary off-the-shelf software. This algorithm may expand the accessibility of clinical applications for non-invasive coronary physiology study.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialAgedComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexComputational coronary physiologyComputed tomographyCoronary circulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.