Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128797›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2018

Tumor heterogeneity and nanoparticle-mediated tumor targeting: the importance of delivery system personalization.

K Laxmi Swetha, Aniruddha Roy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Immune cell engineering: opportunities in lung cancer therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K Laxmi SwethaDepartment of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani, Vidya Vihar, Pilani, Rajasthan, 333031, India.
Aniruddha RoyDepartment of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani, Vidya Vihar, Pilani, Rajasthan, 333031, India. aniruddha.roy@pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3374-421X

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board ECR/2016/000566/LS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the discovery of the enhanced permeability and retention effect in 1986, it was envisioned that nanoparticle-mediated tumor-targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics would make a radical change in cancer therapy. However, after three decades of extensive research, only a few nanotherapeutics have been approved for clinical use. Although significant advantages of nanomedicines have been demonstrated in pre-clinical studies, clinical outcome was found to be variable. Advanced research has revealed that significant biochemical and structural variations exist between (and among) different tumors. These variations can considerably affect the tumor delivery and efficacy of nanomedicines. Tumor penetration is an important determining factor for positive therapeutic outcome and same nanomedicine can show diverse efficacy against different tumors depending on the extent of tumor accumulation and penetration. Recent research has started shading light on how the tumor variations can influence nanoparticle tumor delivery. These findings indicate that there is no "ideal" design of nanoparticles for exhibiting equally high efficacy against a broad spectrum of tumors. For achieving maximum benefit of the nanotherapeutics, it is necessary to analyze the tumor microenvironment for understanding the biological and structural characteristics of the tumor. Designing of the nanomedicine should be done according to the tumor characteristics. In this comprehensive review, we have first given a brief overview of the design characteristics of nanomedicine which impact their tumor delivery. Then we discussed about the variability in the tumor architecture and how it influences nanomedicine delivery. Finally, we have discussed the possibility of delivery system personalization based on the tumor characteristics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignHumansNanoparticlesNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsNanoparticlePersonalized therapyPharmacokineticsTumor heterogeneityTumor penetration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.