ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2018
Tumor heterogeneity and nanoparticle-mediated tumor targeting: the importance of delivery system personalization.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Phase II Clinical Study Comparing Outcomes of NK105 and Paclitaxel in Advanced or Recurrent Breast Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Trial
- Experimental evaluation of Nilotinib and Paclitaxel co-delivered via albumin nanoparticles as a therapeutic strategy for lung squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Cascade-penetrating domino-ferroptosis nano inducer synergizes with sonodynamic therapy for anaplastic thyroid cancer.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Nanomedicine-induced pyroptosis for anti-tumor immunotherapy: Mechanism analysis and application prospects.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Nanomedicine in Cancer Therapeutics: Current Perspectives from Bench to Bedside.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Advances in 2,3-Dimethylmaleic Anhydride (DMMA)-Modified Nanocarriers in Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Review
- Engineering Biomimetic Nanoparticles through Extracellular Vesicle Coating in Cancer Tissue Models.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Usefulness of Nanotechnology in Improving the Prognosis of Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Different Influences of Biotinylation and PEGylation on Cationic and Anionic Proteins for Spheroid Penetration and Intracellular Uptake to Cancer Cells.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Functional Nanoparticles for Enhanced Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Systematic Identification of Genomic Markers for Guiding Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cervical Cancer Based on Translational Bioinformatics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Article
- Single- versus Dual-Targeted Nanoparticles with Folic Acid and Biotin for Anticancer Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Drug Delivery Systems for Hedgehog Inhibitors in the Treatment of SHH-Medulloblastoma.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
- Tumor cell-activated "Sustainable ROS Generator" with homogeneous intratumoral distribution property for improved anti-tumor therapy.Theranostics · 2021Article
- Immune cell engineering: opportunities in lung cancer therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2020Review
- Pattern of pharmacological research from the last six decades.Indian journal of pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After the discovery of the enhanced permeability and retention effect in 1986, it was envisioned that nanoparticle-mediated tumor-targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics would make a radical change in cancer therapy. However, after three decades of extensive research, only a few nanotherapeutics have been approved for clinical use. Although significant advantages of nanomedicines have been demonstrated in pre-clinical studies, clinical outcome was found to be variable. Advanced research has revealed that significant biochemical and structural variations exist between (and among) different tumors. These variations can considerably affect the tumor delivery and efficacy of nanomedicines. Tumor penetration is an important determining factor for positive therapeutic outcome and same nanomedicine can show diverse efficacy against different tumors depending on the extent of tumor accumulation and penetration. Recent research has started shading light on how the tumor variations can influence nanoparticle tumor delivery. These findings indicate that there is no "ideal" design of nanoparticles for exhibiting equally high efficacy against a broad spectrum of tumors. For achieving maximum benefit of the nanotherapeutics, it is necessary to analyze the tumor microenvironment for understanding the biological and structural characteristics of the tumor. Designing of the nanomedicine should be done according to the tumor characteristics. In this comprehensive review, we have first given a brief overview of the design characteristics of nanomedicine which impact their tumor delivery. Then we discussed about the variability in the tumor architecture and how it influences nanomedicine delivery. Finally, we have discussed the possibility of delivery system personalization based on the tumor characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30128797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.