Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128765›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018

Skeletal status assessment by quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry in children with different renal conditions.

P Adamczyk, M Szczepanska, W Pluskiewicz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone health: Quality versus quantity.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Fractures and bone mineral density in childhood].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P AdamczykDepartment of Paediatrics, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland. adamczyk@konto.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-221X
M SzczepanskaDepartment of Paediatrics, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
W PluskiewiczChair of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two methods of skeletal status assessment-quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and densitometry (DXA)-were applied and compared in a group of children with different renal disorders. Skeletal assessments in children with different renal conditions should rather not be based on a single diagnostic tool. Lumbar spine DXA is very effective to reveal disturbances secondary to glucocorticoids, whereas total body DXA and QUS are both better in identification of disturbances related to decreased GFR.

introductionThe aim of the study was to evaluate the skeletal status in children in different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or treated with glucocorticoids, using either densitometry (DXA) or quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods.

methodsSeventy-six subjects (27 girls/49 boys) at the mean age of 11.8 ± 4.0 years were enrolled to the reported study. They were divided into three subgroups: with normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) but treated with glucocorticoids (GCs, n = 38), with decreased GFR (CKD 2-5, n = 26) and with normal GFR and without any bone-toxic treatment (CKD 1, n = 12). DXA scans were carried out at lumbar spine (LS) and at total body (TB), and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging was done at hand phalanges. QUS results were compared to those obtained from 310 healthy matched controls.

resultsThe average Z-score for LS-BMD and TB-BMD was below zero in all the study subgroups. Neither were there any significant differences in the mean Z-score for LS among the subgroups. The mean Z-score for TB was significantly the lowest in the CKD 2-5 subgroup. The percentage of subjects with TB Z-score ≤ - 2.0 was the highest in the CKD 2-5 subgroup (69.2%), whereas the percentage of subjects with LS Z-score ≤ - 2.0 was the highest in the GC subgroup (23.7%). QUS results in CKD 2-5 were significantly lower than those in the controls, whereas the results, obtained in GC and CKD 1 subgroups, were similar to those in healthy subjects.

conclusionsSkeletal status assessment in children and adolescents with different renal conditions should not be based on single diagnostic approach. DXA scanning, performed at lumbar spine, is potentially more appropriate to reveal disturbances secondary to long-term GC therapy, whereas TB-DXA is highly effective in the identification of skeletal disturbances related to decreased kidney function. QUS at hand phalanges seems to be a useful diagnostic means in CKD with diminished GFR but insufficient to detect GC-related disturbances.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentBone DensityBone Diseases, MetabolicCase-Control StudiesChildChronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone DisorderFemaleFinger PhalangesGlomerular Filtration RateGlucocorticoidsHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleUltrasonographyGlucocorticoidsBoneChildrenChronic kidney diseaseDensitometryGlucocorticoidsNephrotic syndromeQuantitative ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID30128765
PMCPMC6267138
OpenAlexW2888107893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.