ArticleSurgery today2019
Clinical role of fludeoxyglucose (18F) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (
Article in Surgery today, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET imaging for pancreatic neoplasms assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- The clinical benefits of [BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- Diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by nuclear medicine: Update and future perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Article
- Usefulness of selective arterial calcium injection tests for functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Role of PET/CT and Therapy Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesClinical predictive markers for the malignant potential of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are limited without histological investigation. We reported previously that a loss of the regular enhancement pattern in preoperative computed tomography (CT) was correlated with the malignant tumor phenotype. This study aimed to establish whether the metabolic aspect of the tumor evaluated by fludeoxyglucose (
methodsAmong 77 patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for a PNET at our institution between 2001 and 2017, 24 who received
resultsThere were four (16%) patients with insulinoma. The mean tumor size was 17 mm and when the median value of the SUVmax (= 2.0) was measured as the cut-off value, the SUVmax ≥ 2.0 group (n = 12) was associated with large tumor size (p = 0.021), high tumor grade (p = 0.015), and irregular pattern on CT (p = 0.0055). The SUVmax was not correlated with age, gender, whether the tumor was functioning or non-functioning, or lymph node metastasis. The SUVmax ≥ 2.0 group had significantly poorer disease-free survival (median, 3.5 vs 16.2 months; p = 0.023) and poorer overall survival (median, 8.8 vs 16.2 months; p = 0.042).
conclusionAn SUVmax ≥ 2.0 on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.