Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128736›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2018

[Internet-based self-management interventions : Quality criteria for their use in prevention and treatment of mental disorders].

J P Klein, C Knaevelsrud, M Bohus, D D Ebert, G Gerlinger, K Günther, C Jacobi, M Löbner, S G Riedel-Heller, J Sander and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Digital interventions for refugees. Challenges, opportunities, and perspectives ofEthik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J P KleinKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland. philipp.klein@uksh.de.
C KnaevelsrudInstitut für Klinisch-Psychologische Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
M BohusInstitut für Psychiatrische und Psychosomatische Psychotherapie, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
D D EbertInstitut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Deutschland.
G GerlingerDeutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde, Berlin, Deutschland.
K GüntherDeutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde, Berlin, Deutschland.
C JacobiInstitut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
M LöbnerInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Arbeitsmedizin und Public Health (ISAP), Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
S G Riedel-HellerInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Arbeitsmedizin und Public Health (ISAP), Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
J SanderDeutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde, Berlin, Deutschland.
U SprickSt. Alexius/St. Josef Krankenhaus, Neuss, Medizinische Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
I HauthZentrum für Neurologie, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, Alexianer St. Joseph Krankenhaus, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet-based self-management interventions are effective in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders; however, for those affected as well as treating clinicians and decision makers in the healthcare sector, it is difficult to identify safe and effective interventions.

aimDevelopment of quality criteria for self-management interventions.

methodsBased on a non-specific assessment matrix, a task force from two scientific societies formulated specific quality criteria for self-management interventions for mental disorders. Patients and other relevant stakeholders were involved in the process.

resultsA total of 8 key criteria with 17 subordinate points were developed. These must be met for the certification of an intervention. The criteria focus on therapeutic quality requirements, patient safety, data protection and security as well as proof of efficacy in at least one randomized study. A further five criteria are only descriptive and are not required for certification. DISCUSSION: These quality criteria serve as a starting point for the establishment of a certification process. This could help to make internet-based self-management interventions for mental disorders part of routine care in the German healthcare system.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInternetMental DisordersSelf-ManagementHumansInternet-based interventionsMental disordersPreventionQuality criteriaTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.