ArticleDer Nervenarzt2018
[Where can psychiatry go from here?]
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Historical aspects of ethics in psychiatry : From the end of humanitarianism up to the Human Rights Convention].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Review
- Lower-dose psycholytic therapy - A neglected approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper addresses possible perspectives for the future of psychiatry in Europe over the next 30 years. Initially, an historical overview over the history of psychiatry since the Enlightenment suggests that significant changes did not primarily originate in psychiatry itself but were rather the result of the given societal contexts. The paper then describes five different potential scenarios for psychiatric care in 30 years time. Following that, the current situation of psychiatrists and possible signs of a crisis are outlined, and specific aspects that characterize the job of psychiatrists, as compared to other medical disciplines and other professional groups in mental healthcare, are considered. Finally, suggestions are made to make psychiatry more attractive, effective and relevant in society, which may make the profession better equipped for future changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30128735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.