Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128728›Full record

ArticleThe patient2019

Treatment Decisions for Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Patient and Physician Perspectives on Maintenance Therapy.

Suzanne McMullen, Lisa M Hess, Edward S Kim, Benjamin Levy, Mohamed Mohamed, David Waterhouse, Antoinette Wozniak, Sarah Goring, Kerstin Müller, Catherine Muehlenbein and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne McMullenICON Plc, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lisa M HessEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Edward S KimLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Benjamin LevyMount Sinai Health Systems, New York, NY, USA.
Mohamed MohamedCone Health, Greensboro, NC, USA.
David WaterhouseOncology Hematology Care (OHC), Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Antoinette WozniakKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sarah GoringICON Plc, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kerstin MüllerICON Plc, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Kerstin.Mueller@iconplc.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3315-4674
Catherine MuehlenbeinEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Himani AggarwalEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Yajun ZhuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ana B OtonEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jennifer L ErsekLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Katherine B WinfreeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USLevine Cancer Institute · USCone Health · USImperial Consultants · GBMount Sinai Health System · USOncology Hematology Care · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a severe disease with burdensome symptoms and traditionally poor outcomes. The treatment of advance disease is based on chemotherapy, with the recent addition of immunotherapy. Patients who respond to initial treatment can opt to receive maintenance therapy (MT). It is important to understand why patients with advanced NSCLC choose to accept or refuse therapy, and how physician recommendations play into this decision-making process. This study characterized patient and physician decision-making regarding treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC in the USA using the example of MT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study employed multiple approaches: patient interviews, a patient survey, and a physician survey. Qualitative interviews were conducted among patients who had been offered MT to identify factors influencing treatment decision-making. The patient survey explored the decision-making process and quantified challenges and motivators for receiving MT. The physician survey included a discrete choice experiment to understand the relationship between physician treatment recommendations and patient characteristics.

resultsInterviewed patients (n = 10) were motivated to receive MT in the hope of extending their lives and being proactive against their cancer, and they anticipated reduced adverse effects compared with first-line therapy. Surveyed patients (n = 77) described several deterrents to receiving therapy; the most prominent was severity of adverse effects, which was an influencing factor for 34% of patients. The major motivator for receiving therapy was the potential to extend life, which influenced 97% of patients. A total of 100 oncologists participated in the physician survey. Patients' lack of treatment motivation/inconvenience, disease progression, presence of severe renal co-morbidities, and older age decreased the likelihood of physicians recommending the use of MT.

conclusionThis study identified challenges and motivators influencing advanced NSCLC patients' decisions to accept or refuse therapy, as well as patient and disease characteristics associated with physician's treatment recommendations for MT.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30128728
PMCPMC6397138
OpenAlexW2888157495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.