ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2018
Upper cervical spine and craniofacial morphology in hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Craniofacial syndromes and class III phenotype: common genotype fingerprints? A scoping review and meta-analysis.Pediatric research · 2024Pooled it
- Head Posture and Upper Spine Morphological Deviations in Patients With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025Article
- Treatment strategy for patient with non-syndromic tooth agenesis: a case report and literature review.BMC oral health · 2024Review
- Structural insights into pathogenic mechanism of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia caused by ectodysplasin A variants.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimMorphological deviations in the upper cervical spine and craniofacial morphology in patients with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) were compared to non-syndromic controls.
methodsAll children and adolescents with genetically verified XLHED, registered at the Resource Centres for Oral Health in Rare Diseases, who met the inclusion criteria, were included. The group thus comprised 15 XLHED patients (3 girls and 12 boys, aged 8-16 years, mean 11.2 years). The control group comprised 22 non-syndromic pre-orthodontic children (14 girls and 8 boys aged 9-16 years, mean 11.9 years) with agenesis of one tooth, neutral occlusion and normal craniofacial morphology. The craniofacial and upper spine morphology was analysed on lateral cephalograms by standard methods. Differences between XLHED patients and controls were tested and adjusted for age and gender by multiple regression analyses.
resultsMorphological deviations in the upper spine occur significantly more often in XLHED patients compared to controls (60 vs. 9.1%; p < 0.01). The cranial base angle (n-s-ar, p < 0.05), sagittal jaw relationship (ss-n-pg, p < 0.001), maxillary inclination (NSL/NL, p < 0.001) and mandibular inclination (NSL/ML, p < 0.01) were significantly smaller in XLHED patients compared to controls. The mandibular prognathia (s-n-pg) was significantly larger in XLHED patients compared to controls (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe upper spine and the craniofacial morphology were different in XLHED patients compared to controls. The results of this study may contribute to a further understanding of the craniofacial and spinal phenotypic spectrum in patients with XLHED and thus have implications for diagnosis and treatment planning of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.