Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128659›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Longitudinal PET imaging of tumor hypoxia during the course of radiotherapy.

Sonja Stieb, Afroditi Eleftheriou, Geoffrey Warnock, Matthias Guckenberger, Oliver Riesterer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Hypoxia Imaging as a Radiomics Signature in Tumors Using NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. JACS Au · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Galectin expression detected byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Interfering with Tumor Hypoxia for Radiotherapy Optimization.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonja StiebDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. sonja.stieb@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-2277
Afroditi EleftheriouDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Geoffrey WarnockDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver RiestererDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxia results from an imbalance between oxygen supply and consumption. It is a common phenomenon in solid malignant tumors such as head and neck cancer. As hypoxic cells are more resistant to therapy, tumor hypoxia is an indicator for poor prognosis. Several techniques have been developed to measure tissue oxygenation. These are the Eppendorf O2 polarographic needle electrode, immunohistochemical analysis of endogenous (e.g., hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1a)) and exogenous markers (e.g., pimonidazole) as well as imaging methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (e.g., blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) imaging, T1-weighted imaging) and hypoxia positron emission tomography (PET). Among the imaging modalities, only PET is sufficiently validated to detect hypoxia for clinical use. Hypoxia PET tracers include 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), the most commonly used hypoxic marker, 18F-flouroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA), 18Ffluoroerythronitroimidazole (FETNIM), 18F-2-nitroimidazolpentafluoropropylacetamide (EF5) and 18F-flortanidazole (HX4). As technical development provides the opportunity to increase the radiation dose to subregions of the tumor, such as hypoxic areas, it has to be ensured that these regions are stable not only from imaging to treatment but also through the course of radiotherapy. The aim of this review is therefore to characterize the behavior of tumor hypoxia during radiotherapy for the whole tumor and for subregions by using hypoxia PET tracers, with focus on head and neck cancer patients.

Indexed as

Tumor HypoxiaHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyHead and neck cancerPETRadiotherapyTumor hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID30128659
OpenAlexW2888278977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.