ArticleNeuroradiology2018
Gadolinium effect on thalamus and whole brain tissue segmentation.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of gadolinium-based contrast-agents on automated brain atrophy measurements by FreeSurfer in patients with multiple sclerosis.European radiology · 2022Trial
- Reliable brain morphometry from contrast-enhanced T1w-MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices.NeuroImage · 2022Review
- Automatic Thalamus Segmentation on Unenhanced 3D T1 Weighted Images: Comparison of Publicly Available Segmentation Methods in a Pediatric Population.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) effect on automated segmentation algorithms of subcortical gray matter (GM) is not fully known. The aim of this study is to determine gadolinium effect on the segmentation of the thalamus and whole brain tissue using different automated segmentation techniques.
methodsEighty-four multiple sclerosis (MS) patients underwent an MRI acquisition of two 3DT1-weighted sequences with and without gadolinium injection among which 10 were excluded after image quality check. Manual thalamic segmentation considered as gold standard was performed on unenhanced T1 images. volBrain and FSL-Anat were used to automatically segment the thalamus on both enhanced and unenhanced T1 and the degree of similitude (DICE) values were compared between manual and automatic segmentations. Whole brain tissue segmentation (GM, white matter (WM), and lateral ventricles (LV)) was also performed using SIENAX. A paired samples t test was applied to test the significance of DICE value differences between the thalamic manual and automatic segmentations of both enhanced and unenhanced T1 images.
resultsSignificant differences (FSL-Anat 1.474% p < 0.001 and volBrain 1.990% p < 0.001) in DICE between thalamic manual and automatic segmentations on both enhanced and unenhanced images were observed. Automatic tissue segmentation showed a mean DICE of 81.5%, with LV having the lowest DICE value (74.2%). When compared to tissue segmentations, automatic thalamic segmentations by FSL-Anat or volBrain demonstrated a higher degree of similitude (FSL-Anat = 91.7% and volBrain = 90.7%).
conclusionGadolinium has a significant effect on subcortical GM segmentation. Although significant, the observed subtle changes could be considered acceptable when used for region-based analysis in perfusion or diffusion imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.