ArticleIntensive care medicine2018
Financial conflicts of interest in clinical research.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessment of Risk of Bias in Osteosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Pooled it
- Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Ivy leaf (Hedera helix) for acute upper respiratory tract infections: an updated systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Ivy Leaf Dry Extract EA 575 in Cough Management: An Updated Review of Clinical Evidence.Planta medica · 2026Review
- Navigating the Surgeon-Industry Relationship: Opportunities, Risks, and Ethical Boundaries.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Critical Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020Review
- Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Our Good Glitazar: Proof of the Pudding is in the Eating.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30128588What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.