Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128560›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2018

Comparison of Artificial Saliva vs Saline Solution on Rate of Suture Degradation in Oropharyngeal Surgery.

Jenna W Briddell, Luke E Riexinger, Jove Graham, Donna M Ebenstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jenna W BriddellDivision of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware.
Luke E RiexingerBiomedical Engineering Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Jove GrahamCenter for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Donna M EbensteinBiomedical Engineering Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Bucknell University · USAlfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · USGeisinger Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Absorbable sutures are designed to degrade and lose strength over time. Manufacturers warn that exposure to various body fluids can change the estimated degradation rate of these sutures, but few studies have been conducted to quantify the degree of change associated with saliva. Objective: To quantify the association of increased loss of strength of sutures over time after exposure to artificial saliva (hereinafter referred to as "saliva"). Design, Setting, and Participants: This experimental in vitro study was conducted at Bucknell University (Lewisburg, Pennsylvania) from June 19, 2015, to July 4, 2015. No participants were involved. The loss of strength over time of sutures submerged in physiological saline and artificial saliva solutions was compared. Three types of absorbable sutures commonly used in oral surgery were tested: chromic, poliglecaprone 25, and polyglactin 910. Data analysis was conducted from July 15, 2016, to August 16, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was 50% strength reduction. To measure breaking strength, 6 knotted sutures of each type were pulled to failure at regular time intervals after immersion in either saline or synthetic saliva at 37°C. Regression analysis was used to interpret strength degradation profiles and to estimate the time to reach 50% of the original breaking strength. Results: Of the 3 suture types submerged in the 2 solutions, all 3 degraded to 50% strength faster (by 2 to 13 days) in saliva than in saline. The differences in the degradation profiles varied by suture type. Poliglecaprone 25 sutures demonstrated a sudden decrease in failure strength between day 5 and day 8 in both solutions, but the decrease was greater in saliva (-10.2 N; 95% CI, -15.5 to -4.9 N) than in saline (-6.1 N; 95% CI, -11.2 to -0.9 N). The polyglactin 910 and chromic sutures share a similar degradation profile when implanted in tissue, but saliva was associated with more degradation of chromic sutures. Differences in degradation rate were seen in polyglactin 910 sutures after day 6 (saline: -0.9 N/d; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.7 vs saliva: -1.2 N/d; 95% CI, -1.4 to -1.1). After day 2, chromic sutures had a degradation rate of -0.3 N/d (95% CI, -0.5 to -0.2) in saline and -0.5 N/d (95% CI, -0.6 to -0.3) in saliva. Conclusions and Relevance: Knowing the association of saliva with suture degradation rates of various suture types may enable oropharyngeal surgeons to select sutures that retain their strength and degrade at an appropriate rate to allow for the effective healing of the wound.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsSaline SolutionSaliva, ArtificialSuturesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansOral Surgical ProceduresTime FactorsSaline SolutionSaliva, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID30128560
PMCPMC6233633
OpenAlexW2888747834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.