ArticleJAMA internal medicine2018
Assessment of the Safety of Discharging Select Patients Directly Home From the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic profiles for discharge destination identified during intensive care unit admission: a decision tree analysis.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Discharging patients directly home from an ICU: a FAREWELL checklist approach.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Percutaneous tracheostomy procedures and patient results in a tertiary intensive care unit: A single-center experience.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Strategies for adapting under pressure: an interview study in intensive care units.BMJ quality & safety · 2025Article
- Discharge from the intensive care unit: Straight home or go to ward? A comparison of their admission and discharge characteristics.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2024Article
- Discharging patients home from the intensive care unit: A new trend.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Review
- Ethical considerations in evaluating discharge readiness from the intensive care unit.Nursing ethics · 2024Article
- Critical illness among patients experiencing homelessness: a retrospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Discharged Directly Home From the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Direct Discharge from the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit: Results from a Longitudinal Assessment.Critical care research and practice · 2023Article
- Co-development of a transitions in care bundle for patient transitions from the intensive care unit: a mixed-methods analysis of a stakeholder consensus meeting.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Patient discharge from intensive care: an updated scoping review to identify tools and practices to inform high-quality care.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Article
- Long-Term Outcomes in ICU Patients with Delirium: A Population-based Cohort Study.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Observational
- Sedation strategy and ICU delirium: a multicentre, population-based propensity score-matched cohort study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 in 14.8 million individuals in Bahia, Brazil.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of an Electronic Communication Tool on Transitions in Care From the Intensive Care Unit: Protocol for a Cluster-Specific Pre-Post Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Assessment of Costs of Avoidable Delays in Intensive Care Unit Discharge.JAMA network open · 2020Observational
- Association between delirium in the intensive care unit and subsequent neuropsychiatric disorders.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Subarachnoid Hemorrhage "Fast Track": A Health Economics and Health Care Redesign Approach for Early Selected Hospital Discharge.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The safety of discharging adult patients recovering from critical illness directly home from the intensive care unit (ICU) is unknown. Objective: To compare the health care utilization and clinical outcomes for ICU patients discharged directly home from the ICU with those of patients discharged home via the hospital ward. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective population-based cohort study of adult patients admitted to the ICU of 9 medical-surgical hospitals from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2016, with 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge. All adult ICU patients were discharged home alive from hospital, and the propensity score matched cohort (1:1) was based on patient characteristics, therapies received in the ICU, and hospital characteristics. Exposures: Patient disposition on discharge from the ICU: directly home vs home via the hospital ward. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was readmission to the hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were emergency department visit within 30 days and death within 1 year. Results: Among the 6732 patients included in the study, 2826 (42%) were female; median age, 56 years (interquartile range, 41-67 years); 922 (14%) were discharged directly home, with significant variation found between hospitals (range, 4.4%-44.0%). Compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward, patients discharged directly home were younger (median age 47 vs 57 years; P < .001), more likely to be admitted with a diagnosis of overdose, substance withdrawal, seizures, or metabolic coma (32% [295] vs 10% [594]; P < .001), to have a lower severity of acute illness on ICU admission (median APACHE II score 15 vs 18; P < .001), and receive less than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation (42% [389] vs 34% [1984]; P < .001). In the propensity score matched cohort (n = 1632), patients discharged directly home had similar length of ICU stay (median, 3.1 days vs 3.0 days; P = .42) but significantly shorter length of hospital stay (median, 3.3 days vs 9.2 days; P < .001) compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward. There were no significant differences between patients discharged directly home or home via the hospital ward for readmission to the hospital (10% [n = 81] vs 11% [n = 92]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.64-1.20) or emergency department visit (25% [n = 200] vs 26% [n = 212]; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09) within 30 days of hospital discharge. Four percent of patients in both groups died within 1 year of hospital discharge (n = 31 and n = 34 in the discharged directly home and discharged home via the hospital ward groups, respectively) (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.35). Conclusions and Relevance: The discharge of select adult patients directly home from the ICU is common, and it is not associated with increased health care utilization or increased mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.