Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128498›Full record

Observational studyJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2018

Factors Associated With Phantom Odor Perception Among US Adults: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Kathleen E Bainbridge, Danita Byrd-Clark, Donald Leopold

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Olfactory Function and Olfactory Disorders.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Headache-Associated Phantosmia as a Harbinger of Lewy Body Dementia.The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
  12. NIH Workshop Report: sensory nutrition and disease.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathleen E BainbridgeNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Danita Byrd-ClarkSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Donald LeopoldUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Phantom odor perception can be a debilitating condition. Factors associated with phantom odor perception have not been reported using population-based epidemiologic data. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of phantom odor perception among US adults 40 years and older and identify factors associated with this condition. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study with complex sampling design, 7417 adults 40 years and older made up a nationally representative sample from data collected in 2011 through 2014 as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Exposures: Sociodemographic characteristics, cigarette and alcohol use, head injury, persistent dry mouth, smell function, and general health status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Phantom odor perception ascertained as report of unpleasant, bad, or burning odor when no actual odor exists. Results: Of the 7417 participants in the study, 52.8% (3862) were women, the mean (SD) age was 58 (12) years, and the prevalence of phantom odor perception occurred in 534 participants, which was 6.5% of the population (95% CI, 5.7%-7.5%). Phantom odor prevalence varied considerably by age and sex. Women 60 years and older reported phantom odors less commonly (7.5% [n = 935] and 5.5% [n = 937] among women aged 60-69 years and 70 years and older, respectively) than younger women (9.6% [n = 1028] and 10.1% [n = 962] among those aged 40-49 years and 50-59 years, respectively). The prevalence among men varied from 2.5% (n = 846) among men 70 years and older to 5.3% (n = 913) among men 60 to 69 years old. Phantom odor perception was 60% (n = 1602) to 65% (n = 2521) more likely among those with an income-to-poverty ratio of less than 3 compared with those in the highest income-to-poverty ratio group (odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% CI, 1.06-2.56; and OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.54 for income-to-poverty ratio <1.5 and 1.5-2.9, respectively). Health conditions associated with phantom odor perception included persistent dry mouth (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.17-4.24) and history of head injury (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.20-2.51). Conclusions and Relevance: An age-related decline in the prevalence of phantom odor perception is observed in women but not in men. Only 11% (n = 64) of people who report phantom odor perception have discussed a taste or smell problem with a clinician. Associations of phantom odor perception with poorer health and persistent dry mouth point to medication use as a potential explanation. Prevention of serious head injuries could have the added benefit of reducing phantom odor perception.

Indexed as

Olfactory PerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHallucinationsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysOdds RatioPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30128498
PMCPMC6233628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.