ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2018
Wide-Field In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Meibomian Gland Acini and Rete Ridges in the Eyelid Margin.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anteroplacement of the Mucocutaneous Junction and Goblet Cell Expansion: Microanatomic Remodeling of the Human Eyelid Margin.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic Guidance in Ocular Surface Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Applications of Imaging Technologies in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Narrative Literature Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Meibomian Gland Probing Stimulates a Proliferative Epithelial Response Resulting in Duct Regeneration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Clinical Practice Guidelines.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Automation of dry eye disease quantitative assessment: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Effectiveness and Safety of Combined Application of Three Modes of 2940-nm Erbium:YAG and 1064-nm Neodymium:YAG Lasers in Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Recent Developments About the Pathogenesis of Dry Eye Disease: Based on Immune Inflammatory Mechanisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Comparison of the Meibomian Gland Openings by Optical Coherence Tomography in Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Normal Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Effects of chalazion and its treatments on the meibomian glands: a nonrandomized, prospective observation clinical study.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Observational
- A Review of Imaging Biomarkers of the Ocular Surface.Eye & contact lens · 2020Review
- Meibomian Glands or Not? Identification of In Vivo and Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy Features and Histological Correlates in the Eyelid Margin.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Imaging of meibomian glands: from bench to bedside and back.Eye (London, England) · 2019Article
- Clinically Relevant Immune-Cellular Metrics of Inflammation in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) has been widely used to evaluate changes in the meibomian glands (MGs) in response to age and disease. This study examined the structures described as MGs using wide-field IVCM and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) in situ and characterized their spatial distribution and localization relevant to the eyelid margin. Methods: IVCM was performed on 30 subjects aged 18 to 38 to visualize structures in the eyelid margin. Size, shape, and distribution characteristics were measured, and individual frames were montaged into wide-field images. Structures observed on IVCM were then visualized using LSCM of whole-mount and cryosectioned cadaver eyelids stained with Nile red, mucin-1 (MUC1), laminin-5, and 4',6-diamidine-2'-phenylindole dihydrochloride. Results: The size, distribution, and staining patterns of the reflective structures seen on IVCM did not correspond to the MGs in cadaver eyelids. Instead, staining profiles indicated that these structures corresponded to the rete ridges present at the dermal-epidermal junction. Wide-field imaging showed a densely populated field of rete ridges with distinct size and shape characteristics depending on their location relative to the meibomian orifices. A distal shift of the mucocutaneous junction (MCJ) was evident in some eyelids. Conclusions: IVCM is unable to visualize MGs in the human eyelid margin due to light attenuation at that tissue depth. LSCM confirms that these structures are rete ridges located at the dermal-epidermal junction. Alterations in the structure of the dermal-epidermal junction within the eyelid margin indicate a shifting of the MCJ and may impact tear film dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.