ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018
Automatic normative quantification of brain tissue volume to support the diagnosis of dementia: A clinical evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Technical and clinical validation of commercial automated volumetric MRI tools for dementia diagnosis-a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- MRI approach to the patient with suspected dementia: artificial intelligence techniques and semi-quantitative rating scales compared.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Left area PF as a neural marker of technical reasoning.Brain structure & function · 2025Article
- Automatic MRI Volumetry Assisted Visual Assessment of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Clinical Dementia Work-Up.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Longitudinal automated brain volumetry versus expert visual assessment of atrophy progression on MRI: an exploratory study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Regional MRI volumetry using NeuroQuant versus visual rating scales in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Applicability of Automated Brain Volumetry in South Korean Population: Need for Population-Based Database.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Normative models for neuroimaging markers: Impact of model selection, sample size and evaluation criteria.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Radiological assessment of dementia: the Italian inter-society consensus for a practical and clinically oriented guide to image acquisition, evaluation, and reporting.La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
- Quantification of amyloid PET for future clinical use: a state-of-the-art review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Review
- Comparing two artificial intelligence software packages for normative brain volumetry in memory clinic imaging.Neuroradiology · 2022Article
- White matter microstructure alterations in frontotemporal dementia: Phenotype-associated signatures and single-subject interpretation.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- Adapting UK Biobank imaging for use in a routine memory clinic setting: The Oxford Brain Health Clinic.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Quantified Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumes Differentiate Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia from Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Effect of MRI acquisition acceleration via compressed sensing and parallel imaging on brain volumetry.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Automated quantitative MRI volumetry reports support diagnostic interpretation in dementia: a multi-rater, clinical accuracy study.European radiology · 2021Article
- An MRI-based strategy for differentiation of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2021Article
- The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia.The British journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Dementia imaging in clinical practice: a European-wide survey of 193 centres and conclusions by the ESNR working group.Neuroradiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assesses whether automated brain image analysis with quantification of structural brain changes improves diagnostic accuracy in a memory clinic setting. Methods: In 42 memory clinic patients, we evaluated whether automated quantification of brain tissue volumes, hippocampal volume and white matter lesion volume improves diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), compared to visual interpretation. Reference data were derived from a dementia-free aging population ( Results: Providing radiologists with only quantitative data decreased diagnostic accuracy both for AD and FTD compared to conventional visual rating. The combination of quantitative with visual information, however, led to better diagnostic accuracy compared to only visual ratings for AD. This was not the case for FTD. Conclusion: Quantitative assessment of structural brain MRI combined with a reference standard in addition to standard visual assessment may improve diagnostic accuracy in a memory clinic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.