Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128163›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2018

Self Help Plus: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of guided self-help with South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda.

F L Brown, K Carswell, J Augustinavicius, A Adaku, M R Leku, R G White, P Ventevogel, C S Kogan, C García-Moreno, R A Bryant and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

F L BrownWar Child Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K CarswellDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
J AugustinaviciusDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A AdakuHealthRight International, New York, NY.
M R LekuHealthRight International, New York, NY.
R G WhiteInstitute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
P VentevogelPublic Health Section, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland.
C S KoganSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
C García-MorenoDepartment of Reproductive Health & Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
R A BryantUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
R J MusciDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
M van OmmerenDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
W A TolDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
World Health Organization · CHHealthRight International · USJohns Hopkins University · USArua Regional Referral Hospital · UGOffice of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees · CHUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CAUNSW Sydney · AUWar Child · NL

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to armed conflict and forced displacement constitute significant risks for mental health. Existing evidence-based psychological interventions have limitations for scaling-up in low-resource humanitarian settings. The WHO has developed a guided self-help intervention, Self Help Plus (SH+), which is brief, implemented by non-specialists, and designed to be delivered to people with and without specific mental disorders. This paper outlines the study protocol for an evaluation of the SH+ intervention in northern Uganda, with South Sudanese refugee women.

methodsA two-arm, single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 14 villages in Rhino Camp refugee settlement, with at least 588 women experiencing psychological distress. Villages will be randomly assigned to receive either SH+ with enhanced usual care (EUC), or EUC alone. SH+ is a five-session guided self-help intervention delivered in workshops with audio-recorded materials and accompanying pictorial guide. The primary outcome is reduction in overall psychological distress over time, with 3 months post-treatment as the primary end-point. Secondary outcomes are self-defined psychosocial concerns, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, hazardous alcohol use, feelings of anger, interethnic relations, psychological flexibility, functional impairment and subjective wellbeing. Psychological flexibility is a hypothesised mediator, and past trauma history and intervention attendance will be explored as potential moderators. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide important information on the effectiveness of a scalable, guided self-help intervention for improving psychological health and wellbeing among people affected by adversity.

trial registrationISRCTN50148022; registered 13/03/2017.

Indexed as

Armed conflicthumanitarian emergenciesinterventionsmental healthpsychological interventiontrial protocol

Identifiers

PMID30128163
PMCPMC6094406
OpenAlexW2887365457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.