Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30128069›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2018

Investigating the Behavior of Published PAINS Alerts Using a Pharmaceutical Company Data Set.

Lewis R Vidler, Ian A Watson, Brandon J Margolis, David J Cummins, Michael Brunavs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lewis R VidlerResearch and Development, Eli Lilly and Company, Ltd., Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey GU20 6PH, United Kingdom.
Ian A WatsonLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, United States.
Brandon J MargolisLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, United States.
David J CumminsLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, United States.
Michael BrunavsResearch and Development, Eli Lilly and Company, Ltd., Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey GU20 6PH, United Kingdom.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochemical assay interference is becoming increasingly recognized as a significant waste of resource in drug discovery, both in industry and academia. A seminal publication from Baell and Holloway raised the awareness of this issue, and they published a set of alerts to identify what they described as PAINS (pan-assay interference compounds). These alerts have been taken up by drug discovery groups, even though the original paper had a somewhat limited data set. Here, we have taken Lilly's far larger internal data set to assess the PAINS alerts on four criteria: promiscuity (over six assay formats including AlphaScreen), compound stability, cytotoxicity, and presence of a high Hill slope as a surrogate for non-1:1 protein-ligand binding. It was found that only three of the alerts show pan-assay promiscuity, and the alerts appear to encode primarily AlphaScreen promiscuous molecules. Although not enriching for pan-assay promiscuity, many of the alerts do encode molecules that are unstable, show cytotoxicity, and increase the prevalence of high Hill slopes.

Identifiers

PMID30128069
PMCPMC6088356
OpenAlexW2879269746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.