Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127945›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Recurrence-associated factors of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy for severely symptomatic adenomyoma.

Wentao Yu, Guanyuan Liu, Chongdong Liu, Zhenyu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wentao YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10020, P.R. China.
Guanyuan LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10020, P.R. China.
Chongdong LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10020, P.R. China.
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10020, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify which patients with adenomyoma would benefit from sparing the uterus and which patients should undergo a hysterectomy to avoid secondary surgery. Patients with pathology-proven adenomyoma admitted to Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital between November 2005 and November 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Relief and reappearance of dysmenorrhea following laparoscopic adenomyomectomy were evaluated. All 49 patients (mean age, 40.6±5.2 years; age range, 26-51 years) presented with severe dysmenorrhea prior to surgery. Dysmenorrhea was identified to be relieved in 83.7% (41/49) of patients at the 6-month follow-up. No factors were revealed to have a significant effect on the surgical outcome. The median follow-up period was 4.6 (1-11) years; and 24.5% (12/49) of patients experienced recurrence of dysmenorrhea. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative serum cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) levels [hazard ratio (HR), 2.356; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.271-3.570; P=0.011], postoperative gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) treatment (HR, 0.540; 95% CI, 0.241-0.873; P=0.017) and accompanying endometriosis (HR, 2.182; 95% CI, 1.556-3.031; P=0.003) as independent risk factors for relapse. Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy is effective for alleviating dysmenorrhea in patients with adenomyoma. Patients with lower preoperative serum CA 125 levels without accompanying endometriosis benefited greater from adenomyomectomy compared with all other patients. Postoperative GnRH-a treatment strengthens therapeutic effects.

Indexed as

adenomyosisdysmenorrhealaparoscopypelvic painuterus

Identifiers

PMID30127945
PMCPMC6096152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.