ArticleOncology letters2018
Screening and identification of key biomarkers in bladder carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-driven consensus gene signatures for improving bladder cancer clinical outcomes identified by multi-center integration analysis.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- Systematic analysis of the lysine malonylome in Sanghuangporus sanghuang.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Association of Mps one binder kinase activator 1 (MOB1) expression with poor disease-free survival in individuals with non-small cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Intersectin 1 (ITSN1) identified by comprehensive bioinformatic analysis and experimental validation as a key candidate biological target in breast cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common urogenital malignancies. However, present studies of its multiple gene interaction and cellular pathways remain unable to accurately verify the genesis and the development of BC. The aim of the present study was to investigate the genetic signatures of BC and identify its potential molecular mechanisms. The gene expression profiles of GSE31189 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The GSE31189 dataset contained 92 samples, including 52 BC and 40 non-cancerous urothelial cells. To further examine the biological functions of the identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs), Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was mapped using Cytoscape software. In total, 976 DEGs were identified in BC, including 457 upregulated genes and 519 downregulated genes. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses indicated that upregulated genes were significantly enriched in the cell cycle and the negative regulation of the apoptotic process, while the downregulated genes were mainly involved in cell proliferation, cell adhesion molecules and oxidative phosphorylation pathways (P<0.05). From the PPI network, the 12 nodes with the highest degrees were screened as hub genes; these genes were involved in certain pathways, including the chemokine-mediated signaling pathway, fever generation, inflammatory response and the immune response nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor signaling pathway. The present study used bioinformatics analysis of gene profile datasets and identified potential therapeutic targets for BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.