Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127856›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2018

Evolutionary methods for variable selection in the epidemiological modeling of cardiovascular diseases.

Christina Brester, Jussi Kauhanen, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen, Sari Voutilainen, Mauno Rönkkö, Kimmo Ronkainen, Eugene Semenkin, Mikko Kolehmainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina Brester1Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 E, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8196-2954
Jussi Kauhanen3Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 C, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen3Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 C, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Sari Voutilainen3Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 C, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Mauno Rönkkö1Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 E, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Kimmo Ronkainen3Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 C, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Eugene SemenkinInstitute of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Krasnoyarsky Rabochy ave. 31, Krasnoyarsk, 660037 Russia.
Mikko Kolehmainen1Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 E, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe redundancy of information is becoming a critical issue for epidemiologists. High-dimensional datasets require new effective variable selection methods to be developed. This study implements an advanced evolutionary variable selection method which is applied for cardiovascular predictive modeling. The epidemiological follow-up study KIHD (Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study) was used to compare the designed variable selection method based on an evolutionary search with conventional stepwise selection. The sample contains in total 433 predictor variables and a response variable indicating incidents of cardiovascular diseases for 1465 study subjects.

resultsThe effectiveness of variable selection methods was investigated in combination with two models: Generalized Linear Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine. We managed to decrease the number of variables from 433 to 38 and save the predictive ability of the models used. Their performance was evaluated with an F-score metric. At most, we gained 65.6% and 67.4% of the F-score before and after variable selection respectively. All the results were averaged over 5-folds of a cross-validation procedure.

conclusionsThe presented evolutionary variable selection method allows a reduced set of variables to be chosen which are relevant to predicting cardiovascular diseases. A reference list of the most meaningful variables is introduced to be used as a basis for new epidemiological studies. In general, the multicollinearity of variables enables different combinations of predictors to be used and the same performance of models to be attained.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseKuopio ischemic heart disease risk factor studyPredictive modelingVariable selection

Identifiers

PMID30127856
PMCPMC6092817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.