Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127695›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2018

A Research Program on Implementing Integrated Care for Older Adults with Complex Health Needs (iCOACH): An International Collaboration.

Walter P Wodchis, Toni Ashton, G Ross Baker, Nicolette Sheridan, Kerry Kuluski, Ann McKillop, Fiona A Miller, John Parsons, Timothy Kenealy, iCOACH study team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding Aging Policies in China: A Bibliometric Analysis of Policy Documents, 1978-2019.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How does it feel to be a problem? Patients' experiences of self-management support in New Zealand and Canada.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Walter P WodchisUniversity of Toronto, CA.
Toni AshtonUniversity of Auckland, NZ.
G Ross BakerUniversity of Toronto, CA.
Nicolette SheridanUniversity of Auckland, NZ.
Kerry KuluskiUniversity of Toronto, CA.
Ann McKillopUniversity of Auckland, NZ.
Fiona A MillerUniversity of Toronto, CA.
John ParsonsUniversity of Auckland, NZ.
Timothy KenealyUniversity of Auckland, NZ.
iCOACH study team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health and social care systems across western developed nations are being challenged to meet the needs of an increasing number of people aging with multiple complex health and social needs. Community based primary health care (CBPHC) has been associated with more equitable access to services, better population level outcomes and lower system level costs. Itmay be well suited to the increasingly complex needs of populations; however the implementation of CBPHC models of care faces many challenges. This paper describes a program of research by an international, multi-university, multidisciplinary research team who are seeking to understand how to scale up and spread models of Integrated CBPHC (ICBPHC). The key question being addressed is "What are the steps to implementing innovative integrated community-based primary health care models that address the health and social needs of older adults with complex care needs?" and will be answered in three phases. In the first phase we identify and describe exemplar models of ICBPHC and their context in relation to relevant policies and performance across the three jurisdictions (New Zealand, Ontario and Québec, Canada). The second phase involves a series of theory-informed, mixed methods case studies from which we shall develop a conceptual framework that captures not only the attributes of successful innovative ICBPHC models, but also how these models are being implemented. In the third phase, we aim to translate our research into practice by identifying emerging models of ICBPHC in advance, and working alongside policymakers to inform the development and implementation of these models in each jurisdiction. The final output of the program will be a comprehensive guide to the design, implementation and scaling-up of innovative models of ICBPHC.

Indexed as

case studychronic conditionsCommunity Based Primary Health CarecomplexityimplementationInnovative Models of Careintegrated careolder adultsprotocol

Identifiers

PMID30127695
PMCPMC6095069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.