ArticleClinical epidemiology2018
CDEGenerator: an online platform to learn from existing data models to build model registries.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Understanding the Nature of Metadata: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- A new AI assisted approach aligns data standards and accelerates interoperability in biomedical research.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Toward Better Semantic Interoperability of Data Element Repositories in Medicine: Analysis Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Europe's Largest Research Infrastructure for Curated Medical Data Models with Semantic Annotations.Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
- Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.Medical image analysis · 2022Review
- Common Data Elements for Meaningful Stroke Documentation in Routine Care and Clinical Research: Retrospective Data Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Common Data Elements for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Analysis Based on the Unified Medical Language System.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- Core Data Elements in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Unified Medical Language System-Based Semantic Analysis and Experts' Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine.Cancer treatment and research · 2019Article
- Web-Based Information Infrastructure Increases the Interrater Reliability of Medical Coders: Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBest-practice data models harmonize semantics and data structure of medical variables in clinical or epidemiological studies. While there exist several published data sets, it remains challenging to find and reuse published eligibility criteria or other data items that match specific needs of a newly planned study or registry. A novel Internet-based method for rapid comparison of published data models was implemented to enable reuse, customization, and harmonization of item catalogs for the early planning and development phase of research databases.
methodsBased on prior work, a European information infrastructure with a large collection of medical data models was established. A newly developed analysis module called CDEGenerator provides systematic comparison of selected data models and user-tailored creation of minimum data sets or harmonized item catalogs. Usability was assessed by eight external medical documentation experts in a workshop by the umbrella organization for networked medical research in Germany with the System Usability Scale.
resultsThe analysis and item-tailoring module provides multilingual comparisons of semantically complex eligibility criteria of clinical trials. The System Usability Scale yielded "good usability" (mean 75.0, range 65.0-92.5). User-tailored models can be exported to several data formats, such as XLS, REDCap or Operational Data Model by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, which is supported by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for metadata exchange of clinical studies.
conclusionThe online tool provides user-friendly methods to reuse, compare, and thus learn from data items of standardized or published models to design a blueprint for a harmonized research database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.