Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127616›Full record

ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2018

Stereotactic body radiotherapy using the CyberKnife

Peter Ihnát, Eva Skácelíková, Milan Tesař, Igor Penka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Retrospective assessment of a single fiducial marker tracking regimen with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumours.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter IhnátDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic, peterihnat@yahoo.com.
Eva SkácelíkováDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Milan TesařDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic, peterihnat@yahoo.com.
Igor PenkaDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic, peterihnat@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of patients with liver metastases presents a challenging problem in clinical oncology. Patients with limited involvement of the liver may be suitable for surgical resection or local ablative techniques. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) presents an emerging new technology that has shown high efficacy in ablating tumors at various disease sites.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles in regard to the SBRT in the treatment of patients with liver metastases.

resultsSBRT allows for the delivery of high-dose radiation in few fractions to the tumor with extreme accuracy, while minimizing the damage to normal surrounding tissue. The CyberKnife

conclusionThe CyberKnife

Indexed as

clinical outcomesCyberKnifeindicationsliver metastasesstereotactic body radiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID30127616
PMCPMC6091471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.