Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127595›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2018

No pharmacokinetic interactions between candesartan and amlodipine following multiple oral administrations in healthy subjects.

Jung-Ryul Kim, Seokuee Kim, Wooseong Huh, Jae-Wook Ko

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hepatic Expression of the NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jung-Ryul KimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Samsung Medical Center, Republic of Korea, jw0701.ko@samsung.com.
Seokuee KimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Samsung Medical Center, Republic of Korea, jw0701.ko@samsung.com.
Wooseong HuhDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Samsung Medical Center, Republic of Korea, jw0701.ko@samsung.com.
Jae-Wook KoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Samsung Medical Center, Republic of Korea, jw0701.ko@samsung.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of candesartan and amlodipine in the absence and presence of each other in healthy subjects.

methodsThis study consisted of two parts: part 1, the effect of amlodipine on candesartan; part 2, the effect of candesartan on amlodipine. Each part was designed as a randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period, two-intervention crossover study with 20 subjects and performed separately in different populations. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed over 48 hours for candesartan in part 1 and 72 hours for amlodipine in part 2 after drug administration on Day 10. Safety data included the results of physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, an electrocardiogram, and adverse events.

resultsFor both candesartan and amlodipine, the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of dosing interval of 24 hours and maximum concentration after drug administration fell within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria. Although this study was conducted in normotensive subjects, blood pressure lowering effects were observed in all intervention groups and co-administration of candesartan and amlodipine reduced blood pressure more than amlodipine alone, but similar to candesartan alone. No serious adverse event was reported throughout the study, and all treatment emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and were recovered without sequelae.

conclusionCo-administration of candesartan and amlodipine did not change the systemic exposure of each drug alone in healthy subjects. The administration of candesartan 32 mg alone, amlodipine 10 mg alone, and co-administration of candesartan and amlodipine were well tolerated during the study.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsCalcium Channel BlockersCross-Over StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug InteractionsHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaTetrazolesAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsCalcium Channel BlockerscandesartanTetrazolesamlodipinecandesartancombinationinteraction

Identifiers

PMID30127595
PMCPMC6089104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.