Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127368›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

EPO does not promote interaction between the erythropoietin and beta-common receptors.

Karen S Cheung Tung Shing, Sophie E Broughton, Tracy L Nero, Kevin Gillinder, Melissa D Ilsley, Hayley Ramshaw, Angel F Lopez, Michael D W Griffin, Michael W Parker, Andrew C Perkins and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karen S Cheung Tung ShingACRF Rational Drug Discovery Centre, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Sophie E BroughtonACRF Rational Drug Discovery Centre, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Tracy L NeroACRF Rational Drug Discovery Centre, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Kevin GillinderAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
Melissa D IlsleyMater Research, University of Queensland and Metro South Health Care, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
Hayley RamshawCentre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and the University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Angel F LopezCentre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and the University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Michael D W GriffinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Michael W ParkerACRF Rational Drug Discovery Centre, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Andrew C PerkinsAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
Urmi DhagatACRF Rational Drug Discovery Centre, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia. urmi.dhagat@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5650-5767
The University of Melbourne · AUMonash University · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Cancer Council Victoria APP1122401Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1036849Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1071897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A direct interaction between the erythropoietin (EPOR) and the beta-common (βc) receptors to form an Innate Repair Receptor (IRR) is controversial. On one hand, studies have shown a functional link between EPOR and βc receptor in tissue protection while others have shown no involvement of the βc receptor in tissue repair. To date there is no biophysical evidence to confirm a direct association of the two receptors either in vitro or in vivo. We investigated the existence of an interaction between the extracellular regions of EPOR and the βc receptor in silico and in vitro (either in the presence or absence of EPO or EPO-derived peptide ARA290). Although a possible interaction between EPOR and βc was suggested by our computational and genomic studies, our in vitro biophysical analysis demonstrates that the extracellular regions of the two receptors do not specifically associate. We also explored the involvement of the βc receptor gene (Csf2rb) under anaemic stress conditions and found no requirement for the βc receptor in mice. In light of these studies, we conclude that the extracellular regions of the EPOR and the βc receptor do not directly interact and that the IRR is not involved in anaemic stress.

Identifiers

PMID30127368
PMCPMC6102255
OpenAlexW2886227389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.