Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127055›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Feasibility and impact of data-driven learning within the suicide prevention action network of thirteen specialist mental healthcare institutions (SUPRANET Care) in the Netherlands: a study protocol.

Kim Setkowski, Jan Mokkenstorm, Anton Jlm van Balkom, Gerdien Franx, Inge Verbeek-van Noord, Dave A Dongelmans, Merijn Eikelenboom, Renske Gilissen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Suicide Prevention Guideline Implementation in Specialist Mental Healthcare Institutions in The Netherlands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kim SetkowskiDepartment of Research, 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan MokkenstormDepartment of Research, 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anton Jlm van BalkomDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center and GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerdien FranxDepartment of Implementation, 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inge Verbeek-van NoordDepartment of Implementation, 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dave A DongelmansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merijn EikelenboomDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center and GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renske GilissenDepartment of Research, 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GGD Amsterdam · NLGGZ inGeest · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImprovement of the quality and safety of care is associated with lower suicide rates among mental healthcare patients. In The Netherlands, about 40% of all people that die by suicide is in specialist mental healthcare. Unfortunately, the degree of implementation of suicide prevention policies and best practices within Dutch mental healthcare services is variable. Sharing and comparing outcome and performance data in confidential networks of professionals working in different organisations can be effective in reducing practice variability within and across organisations and improving quality of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using formats of professional networks to improve surgical care (Dutch Initiative for Clinical Auditing) and somatic intensive care (National Intensive Care Evaluation), 113 Suicide Prevention has taken the lead in the formation of a Suicide Prevention Action Network (SUPRANET Care), with at present 13 large Dutch specialist mental health institutions. Data on suicide, suicide attempts and their determinants as well as consumer care policies and practices are collected biannually, after consensus rounds in which key professionals define what data are relevant to collect, how it is operationalised, retrieved and will be analysed. To evaluate the impact of SUPRANET Care, standardised suicide rates will be calculated adjusted for confounding factors. Second, the extent to which suicide attempts are being registered will be analysed with the suicide attempt data. Finally, professionals' knowledge, attitude and adherence to suicide prevention guidelines will be measured with an extended version of the Professionals In Training to STOP suicide survey. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, The Netherlands. This study does not fall under the scope of the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) or the General Data Protection Regulation as stated by the Dutch Data Protection Authority because data are collected on an aggregated level.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PsychiatricSuicide PreventionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareResearch DesignSuicideSuicide, Attemptedguidelineimplementation studymental health carequality of caresuicidesuicide attempt

Identifiers

PMID30127055
PMCPMC6104797
OpenAlexW2888537095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.