Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30127025›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Hack weeks as a model for data science education and collaboration.

Daniela Huppenkothen, Anthony Arendt, David W Hogg, Karthik Ram, Jacob T VanderPlas, Ariel Rokem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A community-based approach to image analysis of cells, tissues and tumors.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela HuppenkothenInstitute for Data-Intensive Research in Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; dhuppenk@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1169-7486
Anthony ArendtThe University of Washington eScience Institute, The Washington Research Foundation Data Science Studio, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.
David W HoggCenter for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Karthik RamBerkeley Institute for Data Science, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-1757
Jacob T VanderPlasThe University of Washington eScience Institute, The Washington Research Foundation Data Science Studio, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.
Ariel RokemThe University of Washington eScience Institute, The Washington Research Foundation Data Science Studio, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.

Funding

Summer Institute in Neuroimaging and Data ScienceR25MH112480 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Noah C Benson · 2017 to 2026
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH112480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across many scientific disciplines, methods for recording, storing, and analyzing data are rapidly increasing in complexity. Skillfully using data science tools that manage this complexity requires training in new programming languages and frameworks as well as immersion in new modes of interaction that foster data sharing, collaborative software development, and exchange across disciplines. Learning these skills from traditional university curricula can be challenging because most courses are not designed to evolve on time scales that can keep pace with rapidly shifting data science methods. Here, we present the concept of a hack week as an effective model offering opportunities for networking and community building, education in state-of-the-art data science methods, and immersion in collaborative project work. We find that hack weeks are successful at cultivating collaboration and facilitating the exchange of knowledge. Participants self-report that these events help them in both their day-to-day research as well as their careers. Based on our results, we conclude that hack weeks present an effective, easy-to-implement, fairly low-cost tool to positively impact data analysis literacy in academic disciplines, foster collaboration, and cultivate best practices.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationInterdisciplinary StudiesModels, EducationalUniversitiesHumansSciencedata scienceeducationinterdisciplinary collaborationreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID30127025
PMCPMC6130377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.