ArticleBioscience reports2018
Endothelial function as predictor in patients with coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Hokkaido Red Wines on Vascular Outcomes in Healthy Adult Men: A Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2023Trial
- Improvement of Cardiovascular Prognostic Value of Endothelial Function Tests by Repeated Measurements.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Endothelial Function and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of periodontitis on vascular endothelial dysfunction.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Small Fibre Neuropathy Is Associated With Impaired Vascular Endothelial Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed at identifying the predictive role of endothelial function assessed by the RH-PAT index (RHI) for future major cardiovascular events (MACEs) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We measured RHI in 308 subjects with ACS, and they were divided into the normal endothelial function (NEF) group and the endothelial dysfunction (DEF) group according to the RHI. The subjects were followed up for a mean of 16 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 14-20 months) after PCI treatment, and their MACEs were also recorded. Cumulative incidence curves were constructed for time-to-event variables with Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the log-rank test. The overall incidence of MACEs was 25.39% in the DEF group and 15.96% in the NEF group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.