Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30126830›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2018

Expression Analysis of MALAT1, GAS5, SRA, and NEAT1 lncRNAs in Breast Cancer Tissues from Young Women and Women over 45 Years of Age.

Asghar Arshi, Fatemeh Sadat Sharifi, Milad Khorramian Ghahfarokhi, Zahra Faghih, Abbas Doosti, Sara Ostovari, Elham Mahmoudi Maymand, Mohammad Mahdi Ghahramani Seno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Downregulation ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. LncRNAsNon-coding RNA research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metformin reverses tamoxifen resistance through theAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Asghar ArshiYoung Researchers and Elite Club, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Fatemeh Sadat SharifiBiotechnology Research Center, School of Basic Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, Shahrekord, Iran.
Milad Khorramian GhahfarokhiDivision of Biotechnology, Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Zahra FaghihCancer Immunology Group, Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abbas DoostiBiotechnology Research Center, School of Basic Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, Shahrekord, Iran.
Sara OstovariDepartment of Microbiology, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran.
Elham Mahmoudi MaymandCancer Immunology Group, Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Mahdi Ghahramani SenoDivision of Biotechnology, Department of Pathobiology and Department of Basic Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. Electronic address: mgseno@um.ac.ir.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRBiotechnology Research Center · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRIslamic Azad University, Jahrom Branch · IRIslamic Azad University of Najafabad · IRIslamic Azad University of Shahrekord · IRShiraz University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer, as the most common cancer in women worldwide, represents about 30% of all cancers affecting women. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been implicated in the regulation of several biological processes, and their dysregulation in cancer has well been documented. To investigate possible age-dependent variations in expression profiles of lncRNAs, we evaluated the expression levels of four lncRNAs, i.e., MALAT1, GAS5, SRA, and NEAT1, in breast cancer (BC) samples obtained from younger (<45 years) and older (>45 years) women. Tumor samples (n = 23) and 15 normal tissues were collected from BC patients. All tumor and normal samples were morphologically confirmed by a pathologist. RNA was extracted from the tissues and cDNAs were then synthesized. The lncRNA expression levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR. The changes in the expression levels were determined using the ΔΔCt method. Compared to normal tissues, BC tissues from both age groups (women under 45 years of age and women above 45 years of age) showed upregulation of MALAT1 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0002), SRA (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0002), and NEAT1 (p = 0.010 and p = 0.0002) and downregulation of GAS5 (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0005). Additionally, our analysis showed significant and direct correlation between the age and the expression levels of three of the four lncRNAs studied in this work. All four lncRNAs were overexpressed in both MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cell lines (p = 0.1000). Our data show that MALAT1, GAS5, SRA, and NEAT1 lncRNAs are dysregulated in BC samples. However, except for MALAT1, the expression levels of all of these lncRNAs were significantly lower in cancers developed in younger cases, where poorer prognosis is suggested. Of note, GAS5 reduced expression has been documented to correlate with tumor progression.

Indexed as

agebreast cancerGAS5IranlncRNAsMALAT1NEAT1SRA

Identifiers

PMID30126830
PMCPMC6108071
OpenAlexW2885228543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.