Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30126437›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2018

A practice change intervention to improve antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption by women during pregnancy: research protocol for a randomised stepped-wedge cluster trial.

Melanie Kingsland, Emma Doherty, Amy E Anderson, Kristy Crooks, Belinda Tully, Danika Tremain, Tracey W Tsang, John Attia, Luke Wolfenden, Adrian J Dunlop and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Melanie KingslandHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia. melanie.kingsland@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.
Emma DohertyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Amy E AndersonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Kristy CrooksHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Belinda TullyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Danika TremainHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Tracey W TsangSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
John AttiaSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Adrian J DunlopSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole BennettMaternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Mandy HunterMaternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah WardFoundation for Alcohol Research and Education, Deakin, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Penny ReevesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Ian SymondsAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Chris RisselSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Carol AzzopardiMaternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew SearlesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen GillhamHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth J ElliottSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
John WiggersHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (AU) APP1113032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite clinical guideline recommendations, implementation of antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption by pregnant women is limited. Implementation strategies addressing barriers to such care may be effective in increasing care provision. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness, cost and cost-effectiveness of a multi-strategy practice change intervention in increasing antenatal care addressing the consumption of alcohol by pregnant women.

methodsThe study will be a randomised, stepped-wedge controlled trial conducted in three sectors in a health district in New South Wales, Australia. Stepped implementation of a practice change intervention will be delivered to sectors in a random order to support the introduction of a model of care for addressing alcohol consumption by pregnant women. A staged process was undertaken to develop the implementation strategies, which comprise of: leadership support, local clinical practice guidelines, electronic prompts and reminders, opinion leaders, academic detailing (audit and feedback), educational meetings and educational materials, and performance monitoring. Repeated cross-sectional outcome data will be gathered weekly across all sectors for the study duration. The primary outcome measures are the proportion of antenatal appointments at 'booking in', 27-28 weeks gestation and 35-36 weeks gestation for which women report (1) being assessed for alcohol consumption, (2) being provided with brief advice related to alcohol consumption during pregnancy, (3) receiving relevant care for addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and (4) being assessed for alcohol consumption and receiving relevant care. Data on resources expended during intervention development and implementation will be collected. The proportion of women who report consuming alcohol since knowing they were pregnant will be measured as a secondary outcome. DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness, cost and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving antenatal care that addresses alcohol consumption by pregnant women. If positive changes in clinical practice are found, this evidence will support health service adoption of implementation strategies to support improved antenatal care for this recognised risk to the health and wellbeing of the mother and child. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, No. ACTRN12617000882325 (date registered: 16/06/2017).

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAustraliaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaternal BehaviorNew South WalesNew ZealandPatient Care PlanningPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareRisk Reduction BehaviorAlcohol consumptionAntenatal careClinical practice changeImplementationMaternalPregnancyProtocolStepped-wedge trial

Identifiers

PMID30126437
PMCPMC6102816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.