Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30126428›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Can community action improve equity for maternal health and how does it do so? Research findings from Gujarat, India.

Asha S George, Diwakar Mohan, Jaya Gupta, Amnesty E LeFevre, Subhasri Balakrishnan, Rajani Ved, Renu Khanna

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asha S GeorgeSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag x17, Bellville, Cape Town, 7535, South Africa. asgeorge@uwc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-5968-1424
Diwakar MohanSchool of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Jaya GuptaSchool of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Amnesty E LeFevreFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Barnard Fuller Building, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935, South Africa.
Subhasri BalakrishnanCommon Health, Rural Women's Social Education Centre RUWSEC, 61, Karumarapakkam Village, Veerapuram Post, Thirukazhukundram, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, 603109, India.
Rajani VedIndependent Consultant, New Delhi, India.
Renu KhannaSAHAJ, 13 Krishana Society, Haribhakt Lane, Old Padra Road, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390015, India.

Funding

National Research Foundation South Africa Grant No 82769USAID AID-OAA-A-12-00080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to work with civil society to strengthen community participation and action for health are particularly important in Gujarat, India, given that the state has resources and capacity, but faces challenges in ensuring that services reach those most in need. To contribute to the knowledge base on accountability and maternal health, this study examines the equity effects of community action for maternal health led by Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) on facility deliveries. It then examines the underlying implementation processes with implications for strengthening accountability of maternity care across three districts of Gujarat, India. Community action for maternal health entailed NGOs a) working with community collectives to raise awareness about maternal health entitlements, b) supporting community monitoring of outreach government services, and c) facilitating dialogue with government providers and authorities with report cards based on community monitoring of maternal health.

methodsThe study combined qualitative data (project documents and 56 stakeholder interviews thematically analyzed) with quantitative data (2395 women's self-reported receipt of information on entitlements and use of services over 3 years of implementation monitored prospectively through household visits). Multivariable logistic regression examined delivery care seeking and equity.

resultsIn the marginalised districts, women reported substantial increases in receipt of information of entitlements and utilization of antenatal and delivery care. In the marginalized and wealthier districts, a switch from private facilities to public ones was observed for the most vulnerable. Supportive implementation factors included a) alignment among NGO organizational missions, b) participatory development of project tools, c) repeated capacity building and d) government interest in improving utilization and recognition of NGO contributions. Initial challenges included a) confidence and turnover of volunteers, b) complexity of the monitoring tool and c) scepticism from both communities and providers.

conclusionWith capacity and trust building, NGOs supporting community based collectives to monitor health services and engage with health providers and local authorities, over time overcame implementation challenges to strengthen public sector services. These accountability efforts resulted in improvements in utilisation of public sector services and a shift away from private care seeking, particularly for the marginalised.

Indexed as

AdultCapacity BuildingCommunity ParticipationEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIndiaMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesOrganizationsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyAccountabilityCare-seekingCommunity monitoringEquityMaternity carePublic-private mixReport cards

Identifiers

PMID30126428
PMCPMC6102902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.