Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30126155›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Maternal and Paternal Caffeine Intake and ART Outcomes in Couples Referring to an Italian Fertility Clinic: A Prospective Cohort.

Elena Ricci, Stefania Noli, Sonia Cipriani, Irene La Vecchia, Francesca Chiaffarino, Stefania Ferrari, Paola Agnese Mauri, Marco Reschini, Luigi Fedele, Fabio Parazzini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. How Food Choices Impact on Male Fertility.Current nutrition reports · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena RicciDipartimento Madre-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. ed.ricci@libero.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5279-0444
Stefania NoliDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. stefi.noli@gmail.com.
Sonia CiprianiDipartimento Madre-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. son.cipriani@gmail.com.
Irene La VecchiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. irene.lavecchia@unimi.it.
Francesca ChiaffarinoDipartimento Madre-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. francesca.chiaffarino@gmail.com.
Stefania FerrariDipartimento Madre-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. stefania.ferrari@policlinico.mi.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8542-4598
Paola Agnese MauriDipartimento Madre-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. paola.mauri@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1353-6299
Marco ReschiniInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. m.reschini@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-3043
Luigi FedeleDipartimento Madre-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. luigi.fedele@unimi.it.
Fabio ParazziniDipartimento Madre-Bambino-Neonato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy. fabio.parazzini@unimi.it.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine intake, a frequent lifestyle exposure, has a number of biological effects. We designed a cohort study to investigate the relation between lifestyle and assisted reproduction technique (ART) outcomes. From September 2014 to December 2016, 339 subfertile couples referring to an Italian fertility clinic and eligible for ART procedures were enrolled in our study. Sociodemographic characteristics, smoking, and usual alcohol and caffeine consumption in the year prior to ART were recorded. The mean age of participants was 36.6 ± 3.6 years in women and 39.4 ± 5.2 years in men. After oocytes retrieval, 293 (86.4%) underwent implantation, 110 (32.4%) achieved clinical pregnancy, and 82 (24.2%) live birth. Maternal age was the main determinant of ART outcome. In a model including women's age and college degree, smoking habits, calorie and alcohol intake for both partners, previous ART cycles, and partner's caffeine intake, we did not observe any association between caffeine intake and ART outcome. Using the first tertile of caffeine intake by women as a reference, the adjusted rate ratio (ARR) for live birth was 1.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79⁻1.50) in the second and 0.99 (95% CI 0.71⁻1.40) in the third tertiles. In conclusion, a moderate caffeine intake by women and men in the year prior to the ART procedure was not associated with negative ART outcomes.

Indexed as

Maternal ExposurePaternal ExposurePregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultBody Mass IndexCaffeineFemaleFertilization in VitroFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyLife StyleLive BirthMaleOocyte RetrievalCaffeineassisted reproduction techniquescaffeine intakeclinical pregnancyimplantationlive birthrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30126155
PMCPMC6115800
OpenAlexW2886685464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.