ReviewCells2018
Chemokine Receptors and Exercise to Tackle the Inadequacy of T Cell Homing to the Tumor Site.
Review in Cells, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemokine Receptor Profile of Circulating Leukocyte Subsets in Response to Acute High-Intensity Interval Training.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- CAR-T cells in solid tumors: engineering, biomarkers, translational pathways and the road ahead.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advancing CAR-based cell therapies for solid tumours: challenges, therapeutic strategies, and perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- The Therapeutic Potential of Physical Exercise in Cancer: The Role of Chemokines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cancer metastases: Tailoring the targets.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Impact of Physical Exercise on Melanoma Hallmarks: Current Status of Preclinical and Clinical Research.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Reactive oxygen species-responsive dual-targeted nanosystem promoted immunogenic cell death against breast cancer.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- Immune cell membrane-based biomimetic nanomedicine for treating cancer metastasis.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023Review
- Immune determinants of the pre-metastatic niche.Cancer cell · 2023Review
- The peculiar challenge of bringing CAR-T cells into the brain: Perspectives in the clinical application to the treatment of pediatric central nervous system tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Successful treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma with ipilimumab and nivolumab after severe progression under tebentafusp: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- White adipose tissue-derived factors and prostate cancer progression: mechanisms and targets for interventions.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2022Review
- T Cell Engaging Immunotherapies, Highlighting Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy.Cancers · 2021Review
- Article
- Review
- Exercise-Induced Changes in Tumor Growth via Tumor Immunity.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Innovative CAR-T Cell Therapy for Solid Tumor; Current Duel between CAR-T Spear and Tumor Shield.Cancers · 2020Review
- The challenges of adoptive cell transfer in the treatment of human renal cell carcinoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Review
- Microvesicles and chemokines in tumor microenvironment: mediators of intercellular communications in tumor progression.Molecular cancer · 2019Review
- Beta-Adrenergic Signaling in Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy.Critical reviews in immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While cancer immune therapy has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic disease across a wide range of cancer diagnoses, a major limiting factor remains with regard to relying on adequate homing of anti-tumor effector cells to the tumor site both prior to and after therapy. Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of autologous T cells have improved the outlook of patients with metastatic melanoma. Prior to the approval of checkpoint inhibitors, this strategy was the most promising. However, while response rates of up to 50% have been reported, this strategy is still rather crude. Thus, improvements are needed and within reach. A hallmark of the developing tumor is the evasion of immune destruction. Achieved through the recruitment of immune suppressive cell subsets, upregulation of inhibitory receptors and the development of physical and chemical barriers (such as poor vascularization and hypoxia) leaves the microenvironment a hostile destination for anti-tumor T cells. In this paper, we review the emerging strategies of improving the homing of effector T cells (TILs, CARs, TCR engineered T cells, etc.) through genetic engineering with chemokine receptors matching the chemokines of the tumor microenvironment. While this strategy has proven successful in several preclinical models of cancer and the strategy has moved into the first phase I/II clinical trial in humans, most of these studies show a modest (doubling) increase in tumor infiltration of effector cells, which raises the question of whether road blocks must be tackled for efficient homing. We propose a role for physical exercise in modulating the tumor microenvironment and preparing the platform for infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells. In a time of personalized medicine and genetic engineering, this "old tool" may be a way to augment efficacy and the depth of response to immune therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.