Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30126010›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2018

Electrical surrogate for detection of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Kyndaron Reinier, Aapo L Aro, Audrey Uy-Evanado, Carmen Rusinaru, Harpriya S Chugh, Takahiro Shiota, Jonathan Jui, Sumeet S Chugh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electrical surrogate for detection of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyndaron ReinierHeart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Aapo L AroHeart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Audrey Uy-EvanadoHeart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Carmen RusinaruHeart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Harpriya S ChughHeart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Takahiro ShiotaHeart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Jonathan JuiOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Sumeet S ChughHeart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4417-5326
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Sudden Cardiac Death with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection FractionR01HL126938 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHUGH, SUMEET S. · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
Sudden Cardiac Death in Middle AgeR01HL122492 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHUGH, SUMEET S. · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122492NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL122492NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126938NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL126938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis and therapy improves outcomes in heart failure with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%), but some patients may remain undiagnosed. We hypothesized that a combination of electrocardiogram (ECG) markers may identify individuals with severely reduced LVEF.

methodsFrom a community-based study in the Northwest US (the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study), we evaluated the prevalence of conventional ECG markers by LVEF. We then evaluated the association of nine additional ECG markers and LVEF. We validated the correlation of these ECG markers and LVEF in a separate, large health system in Los Angeles, California.

resultsIn the discovery population (n = 1,047), patients with LVEF ≤35% were twice as likely as those with LVEF >35% to have ≥1 conventional ECG abnormality. In the subset without conventional ECG abnormalities, ≥4 abnormal ECG markers from the expanded panel were found in 12% vs. 1% of patients with LVEF ≤35% and >35%, respectively. In the validation population (n = 9,742), 44% with LVEF ≤35% and 17% with LVEF >35% had ≥1 conventional ECG abnormality. In patients without conventional ECG abnormalities (n = 7,601), 40% with LVEF ≤35% and 5% with LVEF >35% had ≥4 abnormal ECG markers from the expanded panel. Each additional abnormal ECG marker from the expanded panel (range 0 to ≥4) more than doubled the odds of LVEF ≤35%.

conclusionsAn expanded panel of easily obtained ECG markers correlated strongly with severely reduced LVEF in two separate populations. This electrical surrogate score could facilitate diagnosis of severely reduced LVEF, and warrants prospective evaluation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCardiac Output, LowCause of DeathCohort StudiesDeath, Sudden, CardiacEarly DiagnosisElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOregonReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentcardiomyopathyechocardiographyelectrocardiographyheart failureleft ventricular ejection fractionleft ventricular systolic dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID30126010
PMCPMC6264892
OpenAlexW2888341161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.