Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30125558›Full record

ArticleContraception2018

Continuation of subcutaneous or intramuscular injectable contraception when administered by facility-based and community health workers: findings from a prospective cohort study in Burkina Faso and Uganda.

Ellen MacLachlan, Lynn M Atuyambe, Tieba Millogo, Georges Guiella, Seydou Yaro, Simon Kasasa, Justine Bukenya, Agnes Nyabigambo, Fredrick Mubiru, Justine Tumusiime and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ellen MacLachlanPATH, PO Box 900922, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Lynn M AtuyambeMakerere University, College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Tieba MillogoInstitut Africain de Santé Publique (IASP), 12 BP 199, Ouagadougou.
Georges GuiellaInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Ouaga I Pr Joseph Ki-Zerbo, 03 BP 7118, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.
Seydou YaroCentre MURAZ, 01 BP 390, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Simon KasasaMakerere University, College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Justine BukenyaMakerere University, College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Agnes NyabigamboMakerere University, College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Fredrick MubiruFHI 360, Plot 15 Kitante Close, Kampala, Uganda.
Justine TumusiimePATH, PO Box 7404, Kampala, Uganda.
Yentéma OnadjaInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Ouaga I Pr Joseph Ki-Zerbo, 03 BP 7118, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.
Lonkila Moussa ZanInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP), Université Ouaga I Pr Joseph Ki-Zerbo, 03 BP 7118, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.
Clarisse Goeum/SanonCentre MURAZ, 01 BP 390, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Seni KouandaInstitut Africain de Santé Publique (IASP), 12 BP 199, Ouagadougou; Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), BP 7192, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Allen NamagembePATH, PO Box 7404, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: anamagembe@path.org.
Makerere University · UGInstitut Superieur Des Sciences De La Population · BFCentre Muraz · BFInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFInstitut National de Santé Publique · GNProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine continuation of subcutaneous and intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC and DMPA-IM) when administered by facility-based health workers in Burkina Faso and Village Health Teams (VHTs) in Uganda. STUDY

designParticipants were family planning clients of health centers (Burkina Faso) or VHTs (Uganda) who had decided to initiate injectable use. Women selected DMPA-SC or DMPA-IM and study staff followed them for up to four injections (providing 12 months of pregnancy protection) to determine contraceptive continuation. Study staff interviewed women at their first injection (baseline), second injection, fourth injection and if they discontinued either product.

resultsTwelve-month continuation in Burkina Faso was 50% for DMPA-SC and 47.4% for DMPA-IM (p=.41, N=990, 492 DMPA-SC and 498 DMPA-IM). Twelve-month continuation in Uganda was 77.8% for DMPA-SC and 77.4% for DMPA-IM (p=.85, N=1224, 609 DMPA-SC and 615 DMPA-IM). Reasons for discontinuation of DMPA across groups in Burkina Faso included side effects (90/492, 18.3%), being late for injection (68/492, 13.8%) and refusal of spouse (51/492, 10.4%). Reasons for discontinuation in Uganda included being late for injection (65/229, 28.4%), received from non-VHT (50/229, 21.8%) and side effects (34/229, 14.8%). Increased age (adjusted hazard ratio=0.98, p=.01) and partner acceptance of family planning (adjusted hazard ratio=0.48, p<.001) had protective effects against discontinuation in Burkina Faso; we did not find statistically significant variables in Uganda.

conclusionsThere is no difference in 12-month continuation (through four injections) between DMPA-SC and DMPA-IM whether from facility-based health workers in Burkina Faso or VHTs in Uganda. Continuation was higher through community-based distribution in Uganda than health facilities in Burkina Faso. IMPLICATIONS: The subcutaneous formulation of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) is increasingly available in Family Planning 2020 countries. Use of DMPA-SC does not appear to change continuation relative to traditional intramuscular DMPA. Growing evidence of DMPA-SC's suitability for community-based distribution and self-injection may yield indirect benefits for contraceptive continuation and help reach new users.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersDrug MonitoringAdultBurkina FasoContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHumansInjections, IntramuscularInjections, SubcutaneousMedication AdherenceMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProspective StudiesUgandaYoung AdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleMedroxyprogesterone AcetateCommunity-based distributionDMPA-IMDMPA-SCInjectable contraceptionSayana Press

Identifiers

PMID30125558
PMCPMC6197835
OpenAlexW2886757699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.