Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30125291›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Amiodarone for arrhythmia in patients with Chagas disease: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Cinara Stein, Celina Borges Migliavaca, Verônica Colpani, Priscila Raupp da Rosa, Daniel Sganzerla, Natalia Elis Giordani, Sandro Renê Pinto de Sousa Miguel, Luciane Nascimento Cruz, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Amiodarone dose to treat ventricular tachycardia in Chagas cardiomyopathy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Use of AlphaFold forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. The Role of the NaFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cohort profile update: the main and new findings from the SaMi-Trop Chagas cohort.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cinara SteinInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1833-8221
Celina Borges MigliavacaInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-2311
Verônica ColpaniInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Priscila Raupp da RosaInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniel SganzerlaInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Natalia Elis GiordaniInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sandro Renê Pinto de Sousa MiguelInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Luciane Nascimento CruzInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Carisi Anne PolanczykInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Antonio Luiz P RibeiroNational Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment, Post-Graduate Program of Epidemiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Maicon FalavignaInstitute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2637-6837
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital Moinhos de Vento · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is a neglected chronic condition caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, with high prevalence and burden in Latin America. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy, and amiodarone has been widely used for this purpose. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of amiodarone in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy. METHODOLOGY: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS up to January 2018. Data from randomized and observational studies evaluating amiodarone use in Chagas cardiomyopathy were included. Two reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Overall quality of evidence was accessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). PRINCIPAL

findingsWe included 9 studies (3 before-after studies, 5 case series and 1 randomized controlled trial). Two studies with a total of 38 patients had the full dataset, allowing individual patient data (IPD) analysis. In 24-hour Holter, amiodarone reduced the number of ventricular tachycardia episodes in 99.9% (95%CI 99.8%-100%), ventricular premature beats in 93.1% (95%CI 82%-97.4%) and the incidence of ventricular couplets in 79% (RR 0.21, 95%CI 0.11-0.39). Studies not included in the IPD analysis showed a reduction of ventricular premature beats (5 studies), ventricular tachycardia (6 studies) and ventricular couplets (1 study). We pooled the incidence of adverse side effects with random effects meta-analysis; amiodarone was associated with corneal microdeposits (61.1%, 95%CI 19.0-91.3, 5 studies), gastrointestinal events (16.1%, 95%CI 6.61-34.2, 3 studies), sinus bradycardia (12.7%, 95%CI 3.71-35.5, 6 studies), dermatological events (10.6%, 95%CI 4.77-21.9, 3 studies) and drug discontinuation (7.68%, 95%CI 4.17-13.7, 5 studies). Quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.

conclusionsAmiodarone is effective in reducing ventricular arrhythmias, but there is no evidence for hard endpoints (sudden death, hospitalization). Although our findings support the use of amiodarone, it is important to balance the potential benefits and harms at the individual level for decision-making.

Indexed as

AmiodaroneArrhythmias, CardiacChagas CardiomyopathyAmiodarone

Identifiers

PMID30125291
PMCPMC6130878
OpenAlexW2888168918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.